MAHESHAN NAGAPRASANNA
Amrut A. Kulkarni – Appellant
Versus
Rashmi Hongunti – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Maheshan Nagaprasanna, J. - The petitioners are before this Court calling in question the proceedings in Crl. Misc. No. 104/2019 registered invoking Section 12 of the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short).
2. Heard the learned Senior Counsel, Sri. M.T. Nanaiah, appearing for Sri. M.R.C. Manohar and the learned counsel Smt. R. Priyanka, appearing for the respondent.
3. Brief facts leading to the filing of this petition as borne out from the pleadings are as follows:
Before embarking upon the consideration of the issue on its merits, I deem it appropriate to narrate the relationship between the parties.
Respondent is the wife of the 1st petitioner and is the complainant in the case at hand. The 1st petitioner is the husband, 2nd petitioner is mother-in-law, 3rd petitioner is father-in-law and 4th petitioner is brother-in-law of the complainant.
4. The first petitioner and the complainant get married on 30-11-2010 and it transpires that from the wedlock, the couple has a child. Differences arose between the 1st petitioner and the respondent-complainant and the relationship got strained. Several proceedings are pending
Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Anr. (2014) 8 SCC 273)
G.V. Rao vs. L.H.V. Prasad & Ors.
Geeta Mehrotra & Anr. vs. State of UP & Anr. (2012) 10 SCC 741
K. Subba Rao vs. The State of Telangana (2018) 14 SCC 452
Preeti Gupta & Anr. vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr. (2010) 7 SCC 667
Rajesh Sharma and Ors. vs. State of U.P. & Anr. (2018) 10 SCC 472
The court emphasized the need for specific allegations in matrimonial disputes to prevent misuse of law, particularly Section 498A IPC.
The court has the power to quash criminal proceedings if the uncontroverted allegations do not prima facie establish the offence and if the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak, and no useful ....
Court emphasized that general and omnibus allegations against in-laws under Section 498A IPC do not warrant prosecution, warning against misuse of the law in matrimonial disputes.
The court emphasized the need for specific allegations in matrimonial disputes to avoid misuse of legal provisions by upholding false accusations against distant relatives.
Point of Law : Section 498-A IPC was introduced with avowed object to combat the menace of harassment to a woman at the hands of her husband and his relatives. The fact that Section 498-A IPC is a co....
The court clarified that allegations against a husband must meet specific legal standards of cruelty while highlighting the misuse of matrimonial laws with generalized accusations against in-laws lac....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.