SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
Mamtha Textiles – Appellant
Versus
Babulaljain – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sreenivas Harish Kumar, J. - This revision petition is filed by the accused in C.C. No. 8523/2009 on the file of the XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru.
2. The respondent initiated proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act ('N.I. Act' for short) against the petitioner as the cheque issued by him for Rs. 1,15,000/- dated 18.10.2008 was dishonoured for want of sufficient funds in the bank account of the petitioner. The respondent issued a legal notice on 12.02.2009 by registered post with acknowledgement due and certificate of posting, demanding repayment of the cheque amount. Since the petitioner did not comply with the demand, he initiated action.
3. The trial Court after appreciating the evidence both oral and documentary, found the petitioner guilty of the offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act, sentenced him to pay fine of Rs. 1,25,000/- with default sentence of six months imprisonment. The trial Court ordered to pay a sum of Rs. 1,20,000/- to the respondent by way of compensation out of the fine amount. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Sessions Court and the appellate Court by it
C.C. Alavi Haji vs. Palapetty Muhammed And Another (2007 (6) SCC 555
Proper appreciation of evidence and adherence to legal provisions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are crucial in determining the guilt of the accused in dishonouring a cheque.
A revisional court shall not interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless they suffer from perversity or illegality; furthermore, a notice returned as 'unclaimed' to the correct address is presu....
The High Court's revisional jurisdiction is supervisory in nature and limited to correcting legal improprieties or perversity in findings; it cannot be used to reappreciate evidence where trial and a....
In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, once the execution of the cheque is proved, a statutory presumption under Section 139 arises in favor of the complainant, placing....
The statutory presumptions under Sections 138, 118, and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are critical in dishonour cases, determining the burden of proof.
In a prosecution under Section 138 of the NI Act, once the execution of a cheque is admitted or proven, a presumption under Section 139 arises in favour of the complainant, and the burden shifts to t....
In a Section 138 N.I. Act prosecution, once the execution of a cheque is proven, the statutory presumption under Section 139 shifts the burden to the accused; revisional courts will not interfere wit....
Admission of cheque signature raises presumption of debt under NI Act ss118(a),139; accused's lost cheque plea fails without bank report; revisional jurisdiction limited to perversity, upholding conc....
Under S. 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, once the execution of a cheque is established, a rebuttable presumption of a legally enforceable debt arises, and mere suggestions by the accused witho....
The court upheld the conviction under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, affirming that a cheque issued for a legally enforceable debt is valid despite a shorter notice period for payment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.