SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 2121

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sudhir Mittal, J.
Monika – Appellant
Versus
Pt. B. D Sharma, University Of Health Sciences, Rohtak & Ors. – Respondents
CWP-10671 of 2022 (O&M)
Decided On : 08-08-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. D.K. Tuteja, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. T.S. Attariwala, Advocate, Mr. Rajneesh Chadwal, AAG, Haryana, for the Respondent.

Retention of original certificates as security for payment must be supported by the terms and conditions of admission and lawful authority, and cannot be sustained without proper legal basis.

Headnote:

Original Certificates - Admission Cancellation - MBBS/BDS Admission Procedure - Clause-9, Haryana Government Procedure for Admission to MBBS/BDS Courses - Notification dated 23.02.2022 by Medical Counseling Committee (MCC), Directorate General of Health Sciences, Government of India - Dr. Arjun Saili Vs. Union of India and others - Retention of Original Certificates as Security for Payment

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought admission to the BDS course, deposited the initial amount and original certificates, but later requested admission cancellation and refund. The respondent refused and retained the original certificates as security for payment of Rs.10 lacs, citing the bond agreement and counseling procedures.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the retention of original certificates as security for payment was not sustainable in law, as the terms and conditions of admission did not entitle the respondent to do so. The court also noted that the petitioner's emails surrendering the seat were sent before the last date for counseling, and the retention of certificates was unfair.

Issues: Admission cancellation, refund of deposit, retention of original certificates, legality of bond agreement, compliance with counseling procedures

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the retention of original certificates as security for payment was not supported by the terms and conditions of admission, and the petitioner's actions did not constitute leaving the course mid-way. The court also emphasized that certificates are the student's individual property and cannot be retained without lawful authority.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and respondent No.1 was directed to return the original certificates/documents of the petitioner within ten days.

JUDGMENT

Sudhir Mittal, J. - The petitioner was granted admission to the Bachelor of Dental Science Course in PT. B.D Sharma, University of Health Sciences, Rohtak-respondent No.1. Pursuant thereto, she deposited a sum of Rs.52,090/- alongwith her original certificates. However, she did not join the course and requested for refund of the amount deposited and return of her certificates. The request having not been accepted, the present writ petition has been filed.

2. The facts are not in dispute. The petitioner cleared the National Eligibility Test for Under-Graduate Medical Courses in the year 2020. All India Counseling was held on 17.01.2022, wherein, the petitioner sought admission to the BDS/MBBS course. Result was declared on 02.02.2022 and the petitioner was allotted a seat in the BDS course in respondent No.1. Initial deposit and original certificates were deposited on 07.02.2022. Vide email dated 14.03.2022 as well as 15.03.2022 request was made that the admission be cancelled. No response having been received, representation dated 07.05.2022 was sent by registered post. Apart from return of original certificates, refund of amount of Rs.52,090/- was also demanded.

3. The Registrar of respondent No.1 has filed a short reply by way of affidavit. According to the contents thereof, the last date of counseling for BDS course was 28.04.2022. The petitioner was granted admission in the first round of counseling held on 07.02.2022. Consequently, her name was included in the list of students dated 10.02.2022 circulated on allotment of college roll numbers. According to the Notification dated 12.01.2022 published by the Haryana Government procedure for admission to MBBS/BDS courses has been prescribed. Clause-9 thereof stipulates that every student shall execute a bond of Rs.10 lacs supported by two sureties that he/she would not leave the course mid-way. In case, the student leaves the course mid-way, an amount of Rs.10 lacs would be recoverable. The Medical Counseling Committee (MCC), Directorate General of Health Sciences, Government of India has issued Notification dated 23.02.2022, advising colleges not to accept offline resignation applications as such vacant seats cannot be included in further rounds of counseling. The petitioner did not apply online and accordingly, her request was not entitled to be accepted. The original certificates cannot be returned unless and until the bond money is paid because the petitioner has left the course mid-way.

4. The short written statement filed on behalf of the State is identical in sum and substance to the written statement filed on behalf of respondent No.1. In addition, it has been submitted that the petitioner has not made any representation to the State authorities.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he only seeks return of the original certificates/documents. The same are the petitioner's property and cannot be retained by respondent No.1. He places reliance upon a judgment dated 26.08.2021 passed by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in W.P (C) No.2109 of 2021 titled as Dr. Arjun Saili Vs. Union of India and others.

6. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 has raised arguments in accordance with the submissions made in the written statement. According to the learned counsel, execution of a bond has been made a condition precedent to grant of admission to ensure that students do not leave the course mid-way as seats go waste resulting in loss of public money and resources. The petitioner has left the course mid-way and is liable to pay a sum of Rs.10 lacs before her original certificates can be returned.

7. The argument of learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 makes it clear that the original documents of the petitioner are being retained as security for payment of Rs.10 lacs.

8. In Dr. Arjun Saili (supra), the petitioner had cleared the All India Post-Graduate Medical Entrance Examination and was selected as Post-Graduate Trainee in MD (Anesthesia)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top