IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P. Sandesh, J.
Mohammed Ajaz @ Kerala - Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 37 of 2022
Decided On : 24-01-2022
Regular Bail - Offence under Sections 353 and 307 read with Section 34 of IPC - The court granted bail to the accused based on the lack of sustained injuries to the police officials, the nature of allegations, and the fact that the accused had been enlarged on bail in similar cases. The court imposed certain conditions to protect the interest of the prosecution.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought regular bail for the offence punishable under Sections 353 and 307 read with Section 34 of IPC. The police alleged that the petitioner attempted to inflict injury with a weapon, but no injuries were sustained. The petitioner claimed innocence and argued that he had been falsely implicated.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that while the allegations were serious, no injuries were sustained by the police officials. The petitioner had multiple cases registered against him for similar offences, but had been enlarged on bail in those cases. Considering the gravity of the offence and the nature of allegations, the court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.
Issues: The issues revolved around the alleged attempt to inflict injury with a weapon, the petitioner's innocence, and the multiple cases registered against the petitioner for similar offences.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the lack of sustained injuries to the police officials, the nature of allegations, and the fact that the petitioner had been enlarged on bail in similar cases. The court also considered the gravity of the offence and imposed conditions to protect the interest of the prosecution.
Final Decision: The petition for regular bail was allowed, and the petitioner/accused was released on bail subject to certain conditions to safeguard the interest of the prosecution.
JUDGMENT
H.P. Sandesh, J. - This petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail of the petitioner/accused in Crime No.68/2021 of Kolar Town Police Station, Kolar Town Circle, Kolar, for the offence punishable under Sections 353 and 307 read with Section 34 of IPC.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State.
3. The factual matrix of the case is that, when the police was on patrolling duty on 06.06.2021 in connection with Covid-19 Pandemic, two unknown persons snatched the gold chain from a women and in this regard, case was registered in Crime No.67/2021 for the offence punishable under Section 392 of IPC and the police were under the impression that the accused persons, who have committed the offence are between the age group of 20 to 25 years and their description is also given. accordingly, when the police were doing ghast duty, found two persons in a motorcycle having similar description and when they stopped the motorcycle, the person, who was sitting in front portion of the said motorcycle, tried to gave blow with the dragon, the police escaped from the said blow. The other accused pulled him, as a result, he fell down. Immediately, when his colleague rushed to the spot, they escaped from the spot in the motorcycle bearing No.Ka-04-JZ-6102. Based on the complaint, the police have registered the case. This petitioner, who is arraigned as accused No.1 was arrested on 07.06.2021 and the matter is under investigation.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that this petitioner is innocent and he has not indulged in such offence and he has been falsely implicated in the case. The counsel would also submit that no injury is sustained by the police officials, even though specific allegations are made and no such incident has taken place and no single piece of material available to show that an attempt was made to take away the life and no medical report is placed. Hence, he may be enlarged on bail.
5. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State would submit that the petitioner is a habitual offender and four cases are registered against him for the offence punishable under Section 392 of IPC i.e., Crime Nos.21/2021, 28/2021, 67/2021 and 69/2021 and including the present case, there are five cases against him. When an attempt is made to take away the life of the police with the dragon like knife, the complainant escaped from the said blow. Hence, there is a prima facie case against this petitioner.
6. Having heard the respective counsel and also taking note of the allegations made in the present complaint, no doubt, it is alleged that he tried to inflict injury with dragon, but, no injuries are sustained. But, the complainant says that he escaped from the said blow. It is also not in dispute that there are four cases registered against this petitioner and all the cases are registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of IPC. When the matter is under investigation and there are several cases registered for committing similar offence and though the counsel submits that, in all the other cases, the petitioner has been enlarged on bail and having taken note of the gravity of the offence, the nature of allegations made in the complaint and the fact that police officials have not sustained any injury and taking note of similar offences, reserving liberty to the State to seek for cancellation of bail order, it is a fit case to exercise the powers under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., subject to imposing certain conditions to protect and safeguard the interest of the prosecution. Hence, I pass the following:-
ORDER
The Petition is allowed. Consequently, the petitioner/accused shall be released on bail in Crime No.68/2021 of Kolar Town Police Station, Kolar Town Circle, Kolar, for the offence punishable under Sections 353 and 307 read with Section 34 of IPC, subject to the fol
The court considered the lack of sustained injuries, the nature of allegations, and the accused's previous bail history in granting bail and imposing conditions to protect the interest of the prosecu....
The court considered the nature of injuries sustained by the police officials and the need to protect the interest of the prosecution in granting bail to the accused.
The court established that bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. when the nature of the injuries is simple and the proceedings are likely to be prolonged, ensuring a fair balance between the ....
The court established that the duration of custody and the filing of a charge-sheet are critical factors in deciding bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
The court established that bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. when the circumstances of the case, including witness statements and the duration of custody, justify such a decision.
Grant of bail based on lack of legal evidence, absence of criminal antecedents, and the prolonged trial process.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.