SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1311

R. NATARAJ
Narayan Lavu Kadam – Appellant
Versus
Channamallikarjun Swamy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Y.Lakshmikant Reddy, Advocate, Ravindra R.Mane, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. All the claimants in these appeals are the injured victims who have challenged the rejection of their claim petition in M.V.C.No.2105/2006 as well as the award of meagre compensation in M.V.C.Nos.2104/2006 and 2106/2006 by the Fast Track Court-I and Member, Addl. MACT, Belagavi.

2. The claim petition discloses that all the three claimants were riding a motorcycle bearing registration No. MH-07/K-6747 from Savantwadi to Morgaon. When they reached near the Maruthi temple, a Tata Sumo vehicle bearing registration No.KA-23/M-3887 (offending vehicle) driven from the opposite direction in a rash and negligent manner dashed against the motorcycle. As a result, the claimants suffered injuries and were treated at Goa Medical College, Panaji. The claimant in M.V.C.No.2104/2006 claimed that he was a skilled worker doing centering work and was earning Rs.5,000.00 p.m. The claimant in M.V.C.No.2105/2006 claimed that he was employed in a private company and was earning a sum of Rs.5,000.00 p.m. while the claimant in M.V.C.No.2106/2006 claimed that he was also doing centering work

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top