Back
K. NATARAJAN
Nagesha – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.2 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., for granting regular bail in Crime No.235/2021 registered by Annapoorneshwari Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru City for the offences punishable under Sections 302 read with 34 of IPC.
2. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for petitioner and learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent-State.
3. The case of the prosecution is that a suo- moto complaint was registered by the Annapoorneshwari Nagar Police Station against petitioner and others on 17.10.2021. It is alleged by the police officer that on 17.10.2021, he was on night duty in the police station and at 3.10 a.m., auto rickshaw bearing No.KA-02-AE-9024 came to the police station and parked and a person came inside the police station and he himself stated his name as Muniraju/accused No.1 and along with another person Maruthi/accused No.3 informed that the deceased Bhaskar had illicit intimacy with his married sister who is having children and he on his way to elope with his sister, at that point of time, the accused persons had obstructed the deceased and took him along with them for purpose of advise in the auto rickshaw to
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of bail in a case involving serious offences based on the evidence and circumstances, and the imposition of conditions to ensure ....
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the lack of evidence establishing the accused's intention to commit murder under Sec. 302 of IPC and the completion of the investigation.
Bail eligibility based on circumstantial evidence and parity with co-accused.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the petitioner's custody, lack of specific overt act, completion of investigation, and pending trial in granting bail for the ....
Criminal Law - Offence of Murder - Bail granted - There is no premeditation or pre-plan and petitioner/accused has not taken undue advantage or acted in a cruel or unusual manner and incident had hap....
The lack of incriminating evidence, non-supportive testimony from the deceased's father, and the principle of parity with the co-accused can be grounds for granting bail.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
