Back
H. P. SANDESH
Keerthi – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. These petitions are filed under Sec. 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail of the petitioners/accused Nos.4 to 7 and accused No.2 respectively in Crime No.41/2022 of K.R. Sagar Police Station, Mandya, for the offences punishable under Ss. 307, 341, 427 read with Sec. 34 of IPC.
2. Heard the respective learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State.
3. The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is that on 24/2/2022 at 10.30 a.m. at Raghavendraswamy Mutt Road, construction work was going on in the new house of the complainant. He went there and after noticing that some work is in progress, when he was returning back at 12.25 p.m. in the Innova car bearing No.KA-55-0856, at that time, another Innova gold colour car came and obstructed his way, wherein 3 to 4 persons got down from the car holding Long and iron road in their hands. They came with an intention to take away his life and out of them, one person holding Long came to assault him and while doing so, he had hit the front class of the car and another person hit the right side glass causing damage to Innova car and glass piece hit his right han
Granting bail based on the simple nature of injuries, unknown assailants, and previous bail granted to a co-accused.
The court considered the nature of the offences, the injuries suffered by the complainant, and the grant of anticipatory bail to accused No.1 in granting bail to the petitioner on the ground of parit....
Bail granted considering detention period, non-grievous injuries, and advanced investigation stage despite serious assault allegations.
The court considered the delay in lodging the FIR, the nature of the injuries, and the prolonged custody of the petitioner in granting regular bail.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of evidence, including the post-mortem report and witness statements, in granting bail for serious offences.
The court considered the nature of injuries sustained by the police officials and the need to protect the interest of the prosecution in granting bail to the accused.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
