IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. Nagaprasanna, J.
Aisha Malik D/o. Ameena Rahil and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Union Of India Represented By Its Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, North Block, Central Secretariat, New Delhi, Delhi And Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No.14333 of 2022 (GM -RES)
Decided On : 28-03-2023
Citizenship Act, 1955 - Section 5(1)(d), 2(1)(b) - Pakistan Citizenship Act, 1951 – Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 21 - Citizenship Rules, 2009 - Rule 11, (2), 13, 14, 15 - Citizenship - Issuance of a passport - Petitioners seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in nature of mandamus to consider their representation filed through their mother, natural guardian for issuance of a passport in their favour and also grant them citizenship in terms of law – Children who are now seeking Indian citizenship can seek only after they renounce citizenship of Pakistan as admittedly, biological father is a citizen of Pakistan - Para 13.
Finding of the Court: Admittedly, both children who have now knocked at doors of Court, even as on date are citizens of Pakistan, as their citizenship has not been renounced in terms law of Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Unless they renounce citizenship of Pakistan, they cannot become citizens of this Country - It is for mother of petitioners to produce all documents necessary before concerned Authorities in India for an Indian citizenship to be accorded in terms of Act - To iterate, children as on today are not Stateless - They are citizens of Pakistan - They have only surrendered passport but they have not renounced citizenship of Pakistan, mere surrender of passport does not amount to renunciation of citizenship - Unless such renunciation comes about, no directions could be issued to Ministry of External Affairs, to consider case of mother for grant of citizenship to children - Therefore, it is for mother, to place all those materials that are sought for by Authorities, to consider grant of such citizenship in favour of petitioners.
Result: Petition rejected.
ORDER :
The petitioners are before this Court seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to consider their representation dated 05-05-2022 filed through their mother, natural guardian for issuance of a passport in their favour and also grant them citizenship in terms of law.
2. Heard Sri S.Sudharsan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Sri Aditya Singh, learned Central Government Counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 3 and Sri B.V. Krishna, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.2.
3. Brief facts that lead the petitioners to this Court in the subject petition, as borne out from the pleadings, are as follows:-
4. The petitioners then approached the Indian Consulate at Dubai and submitted a representation in the prescribed form for conferring Indian citizenship and the Consulate appears to have directed them to surrender the Pakistan passport which the petitioners had in their favour being the children of Sri Assad Malik, the father who was a Pakistan national. The petitioners then surrendered the Pakistan passport with the Indian Consulate in Dubai. It is, therefore, Islamic Republic of Pakistan Consulate issued a no objection to correspond with the Indian Consulate at UAE and completion of formalities.
5. When the petitioners wanted to come to India, they had no Indian passport. At that point in time, the Indian Consulate at Dubai on a representation made by the petitioners had given temporary Indian passport on 31-05-2021 with an endorsement that citizenship status of the petitioners is pending with the Ministry of Home Affairs and passport is issued on humanitarian grounds. The petitioners, on the strength of the temporary passport, travelled to India and are now staying in India with their mother. That passport having expired, the petitioners submitted representations to the concerned and have been so representing for the last one year. Those representations having gone unheeded, the petitioners are driven to this Court in the subject petition, seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for consideration of their cases for conferment of citizenship right as sought in the representations.
6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would contend that the petitioners are in a situation where they have no identity. They have surrendered their Pakistan passports that they had which were granted to them on the strength of their father being a Pakistan national. Temporary passports granted to the petitioners clearly indicated that citizenship status of the petitioners was pending before the Ministry of Home Affairs. The situation now is that the petitioners are nowhere without an identity. Since the mother of the petitioners is an Indian c
Section 5(1)(d) of Act mandates that both parents are required to be Indian citizens for purpose of grant of citizenship to minors.
The court established that in cases where compliance with statutory requirements is rendered impossible due to circumstances beyond the applicants' control, alternative evidence of intent to renounce....
A minor's citizenship by birth is not affected by a parent's foreign nationality, ensuring the child's right to an Indian passport.
A Stateless child is an individual who does not hold citizenship of any State.
None of the parties could bring to the notice of this Court any legal prohibition in incorporating the name of a non-citizen as the legal guardian in the passport of a minor child.
The court affirmed that obtaining a passport from another country conclusively proves voluntary acquisition of its citizenship, terminating Indian citizenship under the Citizenship Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.