SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 706

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.R. RAVI, J.
Rasheeda Bano W/o Mohammed Maroof – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 18750 of 2022
Decided On : 23-07-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M. Sasindran, T.S. Bharath Krishna.
For the Respondents: Mini Gopinath, Sunil Kumar Kuriakose.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that in cases where compliance with statutory requirements is rendered impossible due to circumstances beyond the applicants' control, alternative evidence of intent to renounce foreign citizenship may suffice for the grant of citizenship.

Headnote:

CITIZENSHIP - APPLICATION FOR INDIAN CITIZENSHIP - CITIZENSHIP ACT, 1955, SECTION 5(1)(f); CITIZENSHIP RULES, 2009, RULE 8; PAKISTAN CITIZENSHIP ACT, 1951, SECTION 14A - The court discussed the provisions of the Citizenship Act, 1955, particularly Section 5(1)(f), which allows for registration as an Indian citizen for individuals with Indian heritage. The court also examined the requirements under the Citizenship Rules, 2009, specifically Rule 8, which mandates the renunciation of foreign citizenship. The court interpreted these provisions in light of the impossibility of obtaining a Renunciation Certificate from the Pakistani government due to the petitioners' age at the time of migration and their prior surrender of Pakistani passports. The court concluded that the No Objection Certificates from the Pakistan High Commission and the circumstances surrounding the petitioners' migration constituted sufficient evidence of renunciation, thus influencing the decision to grant citizenship without the Renunciation Certificate.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, a mother and her two children, sought Indian citizenship without providing a Renunciation Certificate for their Pakistani citizenship. The children had surrendered their Pakistani passports as minors and were unable to obtain the required certificate due to age restrictions. The Pakistan High Commission issued No Objection Certificates for their Indian citizenship applications.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners had provided sufficient evidence of renunciation of Pakistani citizenship through their surrendered passports and the No Objection Certificates from the Pakistan High Commission. The court emphasized that requiring a Renunciation Certificate in this context would be impossible and unjust.

Issues: Whether the petitioners could be granted Indian citizenship without a Renunciation Certificate, given their prior surrender of Pakistani passports and the age restrictions imposed by Pakistani law on obtaining such a certificate.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the Doctrine of Impossibility, stating that the law does not compel individuals to perform impossible acts. It concluded that the requirement for a Renunciation Certificate should be viewed as a rule of evidence rather than a substantive requirement, given the unique circumstances of the petitioners.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, directing the 1st respondent to grant Indian citizenship to the 2nd and 3rd petitioners without insisting on a Renunciation Certificate, based on the No Objection Certificates and the circumstances of their migration.

JUDGMENT :

T.R. RAVI, J.

1. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking directions to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P12 representation submitted by the 1st petitioner and to grant citizenship to the 2nd and 3rd petitioners without insisting on a Renunciation Certificate in evidence of renunciation of Pakistani citizenship.

2. The 1st petitioner is the mother of the 2nd and 3rd petitioners. The husband of the 1st petitioner, Sri Mohammed Maroof, was born in India in a village called Kottayam-Malabar in Kannur District. Ext.P1 is the birth certificate of the husband of the 1st petitioner. Sri Mohammed Maroof became an orphan at the age of nine, and he was adopted by his grandmother. In 1977, he migrated to Pakistan along with his grandmother. He was issued with a Pakistani passport later. Sri Maroof is now employed in the United Arab Emirates. He married the 1st petitioner, who is his uncle’s daughter. In the year 2008, Sri Maroof’s family moved to India on the basis of permission granted by the Indian Government to stay in India initially for a specific time frame, and the said period has been extended from time to time.

3. The petitioners submitted applications in Form VI as per Rule 8 (1) (a) of the Citizenship Rules, 2009 for registration as Indian Citizens under Section 5 (1)(f) of the Citizenship Act, 1955 ('the Act' for short). The copies of the applications submitted by the 2nd and 3rd petitioners have been produced as Exts.P2. and P2(a) respectively. On 09.11.2016, the 1st respondent issued orders in respect of the 2nd petitioner stating that the Government of India has decided to grant registration to the 2nd petitioner under Section 5(1)(f) of the Citizenship Act, 1955, subject to compliance with certain requirements and submission of documents. A similar order was issued in respect of the 3rd petitioner on 05.09.2017. The above two orders have been produced as Exts.P3 and P3(a) respectively. One of the documents that was required to be submitted is the Renunciation Certificate issued by the Pakistani Government. The 2nd and 3rd petitioners have submitted all other documents that had been required to be submitted. The petitioners have stated in the representations submitted as Exts.P4 and P4(a) before the 4th respondent and the 5th respondent, that the Pakistani Embassy would issue a Renunciation Certificate only after they attain the age of 21 years and that in their cases such certificates cannot be issued even after the attainment of 21 years as the petitioners 2 and 3 had already surrendered their respective Pakistani passports before attaining the age of 21 years. On 08.05.2018, the Pakistan High Commission issued certificates stating that they have no objection to granting Indian citizenship to the 2nd and 3rd petitioners. Exts.P5 and P5(a) are the No Objection Certificates issued on 08.05.2018. The 2nd respondent had forwarded Ext.P6 Government Order to the 1st respondent stating that all documents except the Renunciation Certificate have been submitted. The 1st respondent sent Ext.P7 reply on 17.07.2019 stating that the No Objection Certificates that have been forwarded are not acceptable, that Renunciation Certificate is mandatory, and that petitioners 2 and 3 will remain as Pakistani Citizens in the records unless they renounce their Pakistani citizenship.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned CGC for the 1st respondent and learned Government Pleader for respondents 2 to 4.

5. Section 14A of the Pakistan Citizenship Act, 1951 deals with renunciation of Pakistani citizenship. As per Section 14 A (1) of the Act, if any citizen of Pakistan residing outside Pakistan, who is not a minor and has been given by the competent authority of another country any valid document assuring him of the grant of citizenship or nationality of that country, upon renouncing his citizenship of Pakistan, makes a declaration renouncing his citizenship of Pakistan, in the prescribed manner, the declaration shall

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top