Back
H. P. SANDESH
Renukaprasad K. V. S/o K. M. Venkataramana Gowda – Appellant
Versus
M. Puttaswamy S/o Late Motaiah – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
These appeals are filed under Order 43, Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying this Court to set aside the order dated 16.06.2023 passed by the VI Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge (CCH-11) at Bengaluru City, on I.A.No.1 in O.S.No.3590/2023. Consequently, allow the application and grant the relief as sought therein and pass such other order or directions as this Court deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and allow the Miscellaneous First Appeals.
2. The appellants in MFA No.4320/2023 are the plaintiffs have filed a suit for the relief of declaration to declare that the alleged resolution dated 09.06.2023 referred to in a paper publication dated 10.06.2023 published in Vijayavani Kannada Daily Newspaper and notice dated 09.06.2023 issued by the defendant as illegal, null and void and non-est and issue a consequential direction that the same shall not be given effect to or implemented; declare that the alleged Meeting dated 09.06.2023 referred to in the Paper Publication dated 10.06.2023 in Vijayavani Kannada Daily News Paper as well as notice dated 09.06.2023 as illegal, null and void and consequently, restrain defendant from
Section 25 of Act which reads as enquiry by Registrar, etc.
Point of law: That it is basic to our processual jurisprudence that the right to relief must be judged to exist as on the date a suitor institutes the legal proceeding.
Compliance with Order-1 Rule-8 CPC was not necessary as the societies were capable of suing or being sued without taking recourse to the rule. The judgment in the earlier suit was binding on each and....
A no-confidence motion against a municipal Vice-Chairperson is valid without the necessity of specific reasons in the resolution, and adherence to statutory notice requirements fulfills procedural ju....
Provisions of Section 76(B(2) would stand somewhat on different footing. This Court when is taking a view that action could be initiated under subsection (2) only after passing order of removal, issu....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
