V. SRISHANANDA
Nabisab, S/o. Huchchesab Agnnamani – Appellant
Versus
Hatelsab S/o. Huchchedab Sannamani – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Present second appeal is filed by the plaintiff against the defendant.
2. The appeal came to be admitted on the following substantial question of law.
3. Parties are referred to as plaintiff and defendant for the sake of convenience as per their original ranking in the trial Court.
4. Heard Sri T.M. Nadaf and Sri Sadiq N. Goodwala, learned counsels for the appellant and Sri Suraj M. Katagi, learned counsel for the respondent.
5. Brief facts of the case are as under:
A suit came to be filed by the plaintiff in O.S.No.52/2001 before the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Kalghatagi for the relief of declaration and permanent injunction against the defendant declaring that plaintiff is the absolute owner of the following properties.
| Sl. No. | Sy.No. | Measurement |
|
| 1. | 1/2 | 6 guntas |
Situated at Bogenagarakoppa villa |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.