SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Kumari Tejaswini D/o Umesh Uppin – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Petitioner No. 1 in the present writ petition is also petitioner in W.P. No. 108306/2014 and she has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the present writ petition also.
2. An application is filed seeking discharge of minor guardianship. The cause shown is accepted. Perused the birth certificate of petitioner No. 1. She has attained majority. Petitioner No. 1 has also filed memo seeking withdrawal of the present petition. Since she has attained majority, the memo filed by her seeking withdrawal of the petition is accepted and W.P. No. 108307/2014 insofar as petitioner No. 1 is concerned, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. The land owners have questioned the final notification vide Annexure-B and E, respectively, on the ground that the proposed acquisition is without securing approval of the scheme. The petitioners have also questioned the action of the State in acquiring petition lands on the ground that the same contravenes Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short “Land Acquisition Act”). The petitioners’ grievance is that there is no objective assessment of the objections tendered by the land owners under Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act. T
Aflatoon and Others vs. Lt. Governor, Delhi and Others
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay vs. I.D.I. Co. Pvt. 1996 (11) SCC 501
State of Tamil Nadu and Another vs. Mohammed Yousef and Others
Sriniwas Ramanath Khatod vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
State of Rajasthan and Others vs. D.R. Laxmi and Others
Smt. Sudama Devi vs. Commissioner and Others
State of Tamil Nadu vs. L. Krishnan and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.