IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
C.M. POONACHA, J.
Lakshmidevi W/O G Narasimhamurthy – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Karnataka – Respondent
Writ Petition No.20352 of 2023 (CS-EL/M) C/W Writ Petition No.20838 of 2023 (CS-EL/M)
Decided on : 04-12-2023
Election Postponement - Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Section 28A(4), 28B, 39AA(15), Rule 13D(2-A), 14 - The court quashed the order directing election postponement and mandated the continuation of the election process from the stage it was stopped, emphasizing the statutory obligation to conduct elections within the stipulated time and the impermissibility of interference once the election process has commenced.
Fact of the Case:
The election to the fifth respondent – society was scheduled for 15.9.2023. However, the District Election Officer directed the Returning Officer to postpone the election on 8.9.2023, citing non-compliance with the mandatory stipulations under Rule 13D(2-A) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules, 1960. The petitioners challenged this directive, arguing that once the calendar of events is issued, the authorities lose jurisdiction to interfere with the election process.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the election process, having commenced with the issuance of the calendar of events, cannot be deferred or postponed by the Returning Officer acting in compliance with the direction of the Electoral Officer. It emphasized the statutory obligation to conduct elections within the stipulated time and the impermissibility of interference once the election process has commenced.
Issues: The primary issue was the jurisdiction of the District Election Officer in issuing the order directing the Returning Officer to postpone the elections.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the statutory obligation to conduct elections within the stipulated time and the impermissibility of interference once the election process has commenced. It held that the process of elections, having commenced, should be continued from the stage where it was stopped, and mandated the continuation of the election process from the stage it was stopped.
Final Decision: The court quashed the order directing election postponement and mandated the continuation of the election process from the stage it was stopped, emphasizing the statutory obligation to conduct elections within the stipulated time and the impermissibility of interference once the election process has commenced.
ORDER :
The reliefs sought for by the petitioners in WP No.20352/2023 are as under:
ii) Issue a Writ of Mandamus to the respondents No.2 to 4 directing to conduct and complete the Elections to 5th respondent society in terms of scheduled Calendar of Events issued as per Annexure-A dated 03.07.2023 fixing date of Election as 15.09.2023 to the 5th respondent society.
iii) Issue any other incidental or consequential relief/s as deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case and in aid of the main relief sought for, in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. The reliefs sought for by the petitioners in WP.No.20838/2023 are as under:
b) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.6 to conduct the election as per notification/calendar of events issued at Annexure-H from the stage at which it was interfered with or in the alternative direct the Respondent No.6 to reschedule the dates and conduct of election to Respondent No.5 society immediately before the expiry of the term of Petitioners in the interest of justice and equity.
c) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents not to take any action against the petitioners till the elections to Respondent No.5 society are held for the term 2023 to 2028, in the interest of justice and equity.
d) Issue such other order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit under the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity.”
3. The relevant facts necessary for consideration of the present writ petitions are that the election to the fifth respondent – society was held on 15.9.2018. The CEO of the society vide letter dated 15.2.2023 submitted draft list of voters to the District Election Officer and vide letter dated 27.6.2023 requested the District Election Officer to appoint a Returning Officer. Vide communication dated 3.7.2023, the District Election Officer appoints the Returning Officer and a voter list Verification Officer. Vide order dated 11.8.2023 a Special Officer has been appointed under Section 31 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). On 29.8.2023 the Verification Officer submits a verified voter list to the District Election Officer, which is approved by the District Election Officer on 30.8.2023. Thereafter, on 31.8.2023, the Returning Officer issued the calendar of events. Vide communication dated 8.9.2023, the District Election Officer directs the Returning Officer to postpone the election. Being aggrieved, the present petitions are filed.
4. Learned Senior Counsel Sri Jayakumar S.Patil and Sri D.R.Ravishankar, appearing for the petitioners in the writ petitions submit that once the calendar of events have been issued on 31.8.2023, it is not open to the authorities to postpone the election and more so, in the present case where the District Election Officer has directed the Returning Officer to postpone the same. It is further submitted that once the calendar of events is issued, the District Election Officer loses his jurisdiction to interfere with the election process and hence, the reliefs sought for in the present writ petitions are required to be granted. Learned Senior counsels also made submissions as to the motive and the reason behind postponing of the election alleging that there is interference by the State authorities at the instance of the persons inimical to the petitioners. In support of their contentions, the learned Senior Counsels rely on various judgments which shall be considered during t
B.D.Manjunath & ors., v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
Bharatiya Seva Samaj Trust v. Yogeshbhai Ambalal Patel & Anr.
Channaiah & Ors., v. State of Karnataka
Chandra Singh & ors., v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.
Kishansing Tomar v. Municipal Corpn. Of the City of Ahmedabad
Elections for a co-operative society must be conducted before the board's term expires, and postponement requires valid legal grounds, not merely the absence of police protection.
Compliance with statutory election procedures within cooperative societies is mandatory to ensure valid electoral processes; neglecting to notify ineligible voters invalidates election actions.
The court reaffirmed that administrative actions must adhere to proper legal procedures and that arbitrary withdrawal of electoral notifications without just cause constitutes legal malice, disruptin....
The court ruled that the provisional voters' list must be based on the correct date as per statutory rules, emphasizing compliance with election regulations.
The court emphasized that judicial intervention is warranted in election matters when there are clear violations of statutory provisions, despite the general principle of non-interference in ongoing ....
The preparation of electoral roll under Rule 13-D(2-A) is an integral part of the election process, and the writ petition to challenge the electoral roll on the ground of non-compliance with Rule 13-....
Government exemptions allow newly registered co-operative societies to vote, overriding internal clarifications against their participation.
Maharashtra State Co-operative Election Authority - Cut-off date for election - Election Authority rejecting to extend cut off date without recording sufficient reasons has not been exercised judicio....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.