SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 591

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
Suraj Govindaraj, J.
Ms. X, D/O Shri Gopala T - Petitioner
Versus
State of Karnataka Rep by Its Principal Secretary and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition NO. 27563 of 2023 (GM-RES)
Decided On : 12-12-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Prasanna Kumar P., Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri. Naveenchandrashekar., Aga, Smt. Shilpa Rani., Advocate

The judgment establishes the importance of timely decisions on medical termination of pregnancy for minor victims of sexual offences, emphasizing the need for immediate medical examination, counseling, and preservation of evidence.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Medical Termination of Pregnancy - Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, Section 3 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act - Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a minor girl, sought a writ for medical termination of pregnancy due to alleged sexual offences. The court constituted a Medical Board which recommended the procedure. The court considered the petitioner's age, her inability to care for the child, and the mental trauma caused by delayed decisions on termination of pregnancy.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the petition for medical termination of pregnancy and directed the hospital to carry out the procedure, preserve tissue samples for DNA analysis, and report compliance.

Issues: Medical termination of pregnancy for a minor victim of sexual offences, consideration of the victim's age and well-being, and the need for timely decisions on termination of pregnancy in such cases.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for immediate medical examination of victims of sexual offences to ascertain pregnancy and gestation period, counseling on legal options, preservation of tissue samples for DNA analysis, and the preparation of a detailed standard operating procedure for such cases.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the hospital was directed to carry out the medical termination of pregnancy, preserve tissue samples, and report compliance.

ORDER :

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the 4th Respondent/hospital to admit the petitioner and take necessary medical steps to terminate the pregnancy of the petitioner.

b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the 4th respondent/hospital to preserve the terminated fetus/product of conception for the purpose of identification and DNA testing & analysis;

c. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent/police to take all the steps and conduct DNA test at State Forensic Laboratory, Madiwala, Bengaluru to the terminated fetus/product of conception for the purpose of investigation & trial in connection with Crime No. 391/2023 dated 26.11.2023 registered by the 2nd Respondent/police vide Annexure-F

d. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the 3rd respondent/ authority to disburse a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lakh only) and/or any other further amount to the petitioner in order for her to meet the expenses of medical treatments, counselling services & any other medical care that the petitioner may require and

e. Grant such other reliefs, as deemed fit in the circumstances of the case including the compensation, in the interest of justice.

2. The petitioner is a minor girl aged about 17 years represented by her father natural guardian. The petitioner is referred to as the victim and/or Ms.X in order to protect her privacy.

3. The FIR and complaint in Crime No.391/2023 was registered on 26.11.2023 under Section 363 of IPC by the father/natural guardian of the petitioner apprehending that she had been kidnapped/abducted. During the course of investigation, respondent No.2 police traced the petitioner. When she was traced, she revealed that the accused was a resident near to the house of the petitioner and he had firstly taken her to the deserted place and committed an act of sexual intercourse in the back seat of an auto while promising to marry her.

4. Thereafter, he took her away from her parents house and committed the act of sexual intercourse 4 to 5 times instructing the petitioner not to reveal the same to anyone. The petitioner’s menstrual cycle having stopped and the petitioner having done a pregnancy check using a pregnancy kit on 19.11.2023 which stood positive.

5. At that time, the accused promised to marry the petitioner and it is at this stage that the petitioner while standing near the bus stand was secured by the police and thereafter, on conducting a ultrasound video diagnosis, it came to light that the petitioner is pregnant with live intra uterine fetus of 24 weeks + 2 days. Hence, the offences under 376 IPC, Section 5(l) and 6 of POSCO Act as also offences under Section 3(1)(w) (i) and (ii) and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 have been added to the FIR.

6. In the meanwhile, the petitioner was hospitalized with respondent No.4 and the petitioner and her natural guardian father wishing to terminate her pregnancy and not wanting to continue with the birth of the child had requested the concerned doctors to terminate the pregnancy. However, the pregnancy having crossed 24 weeks and being beyond the limits prescribed under Rule 3B of Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003, the petitioner was asked to approach this Court which the petitioner has done.

7. The petitioner being a minor studying in II PUC being of the opinion that if she were to continue with the pregnancy she would not be able to study and also that she would not be able to mingle in the society which would effect her both physically and psychologically is wanting to terminate the pregnancy. It is contended that the petitioner does not wish to continue the unwanted pregnancy which violate the integrity of her body and on account of going through severe mental trauma which would

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top