Back
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Kumari M. – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER
1. The petitioner is before this Court, seeking for the following reliefs:
(i) Issue writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent No. 2 to Medically terminate the pregnancy of petitioner minor Victim forthwith.
(ii) Issue any other writ or directions as deem fit by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice and equity.
2. The petitioner being minor, represented by her father. The petitioner is a victim of an offence under Sections 4 & 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 read with Sections 363, 366-A, 376(2)(n) and 506 of the IPC.
3. On account of the said offence, the petitioner minor girl conceived and is now pregnant for 22 weeks.
4. In view of the petition being filed, vide order dated 03.03.2022, the matter was referred to the Medical Board constituted under Section 3(2)(a) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. Thereafter, the Medical Board has examined the petitioner and submitted a report dated 05.03.2022. Though certain complications have been stated in the said report, the report also mentions that if the procedure is not carried out, it may effect the mental health of the petitioner and if pregnancy is continued, it may cau
The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, specifically Section 3(2)(b), which allows termination of pregnancy if it poses a risk to the woman's....
The court's decision emphasized the importance of considering the mental and physical well-being of the victim in allowing the termination of pregnancy beyond the statutory limit.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, and the consideration of the physical and mental health risks to the pregnant....
The court ruled that a minor victim of rape may have her pregnancy terminated under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, if it poses a grave risk to her mental health.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, in the context of a minor victim of rape seeking terminati....
The Court reiterated that the rights of minor victims of sexual assault must be balanced with welfare considerations in matters of pregnancy termination under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act....
A minor rape survivor's mental health is a critical consideration in granting permission for medical termination of pregnancy beyond statutory limits.
The court found that medical termination of pregnancy depends on comprehensive clinical evaluation, emphasizing health risks and legal protocols for minors.
The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, and the legal presumption regarding pregnancy resulting from rape, as well as the best interest....
The court established that minors can terminate pregnancies resulting from sexual abuse with guardian consent, prioritizing mental health considerations.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
