R. NATARAJ
M. K. Ahmad Super Market – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagar Palike Corporation Circle – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. The petitioner has challenged the notice dtd. 20/7/2015 issued by the respondent No.2 calling upon it to show cause as to why the commercial activity undertaken by it in a residential area should not be closed. The petitioner has also challenged the notice dtd. 16/8/2016 to show cause within three days as to why the licence granted to the petitioner to run commercial activity in the premises in question should not be cancelled. He has also challenged a notice dtd. 16/1/2017 wherein it was stated that the petitioner was conducting commercial activity in a residential zone and that the petitioner had violated the Zoning Regulations notified by the State Government on 20/3/2015 as per the Order passed by this Court in W.P. No.3676/2008. The petitioner was called upon to show cause as to why the commercial activity undertaken by it should not be closed.
2. The petitioner claims that it had taken on lease the property bearing No.118, 3rd / 8th Main Road, Sarakki Dollar Layout, IV Phase, J.P. Nagar, Bengaluru-560 078 (henceforth referred to as 'the petition schedule property') from its owners to run a super market. It claimed that the schedule property lay at the corner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.