RAVINDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL
Ku. Reeta Peter D/o Shri P. N. Peter – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh through A. C. B. , Raipur, District Raipur, (C. G. ) – Respondent
JUDGMENT ON BOARD :
1. The present appeal arises out of the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence dated 23.04.2016 passed by Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) in Special Criminal Case No. 06/2013 whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 7, 13 (1) (d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, (for short, “the Act, 1988”) whereby the learned trial Court has sentenced the appellant in the following manner with a direction to run all sentences concurrently:
| Conviction | Sentence |
| U/S 7 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 | RI for one year and fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo additional RI for three months. |
| U/S 13(1) (d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 | RI for one year and fine of Rs. 1000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo additional RI for 3 months. |
2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant was working as the Forest Guard in the office of Sub Divisional
Suraj Mal vs. The State (Delhi Administration) reported in AIR 1979 SC 1408
State of Kerala vs. C. P. Rao (2011) 6 SCC 450
B. Jayaraj vs. State of A. P (2014) 13 SCC 55
Sejappa vs. State (2016) 12 SCC 150
Neeraj Dutta vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2023) 4 SCC 731
Suraj Mal vs. State (Delhi Admn.)
RPS Yadav Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in (2015) 11 SCC 642
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.