Back
V SRISHANANDA
Gowtham – Appellant
Versus
State By Doddaballapura Police Station, Doddaballapura Taluk, Doddaballapura – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
V Srishananda, J. - Heard Sri. T. Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Vinayaka V.S., learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State. Perused the records.
2. Present petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. with the following prayer:
'WHEREFORE, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to grant the Bail to the petitioner (A2) in Cr.No.25/2023 of Doddaballapura Rural Police Station for the offences punishable under Section 397 of IPC pending on the file of Prl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC Court, Doddaballapura, on such terms and conditions, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit to pass in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the ends of justice."
3. The brief facts of the case are as under:
A complaint came to be lodged by Nithesh Srivathsav S/o. Nandakishor Srivathsav with Doddaballapura Rural Police Station, which was registered in Crime No.25/2023 on 23.01.2023 for the offences punishable under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC' for short) against the petitioner and unknown persons for the first instance.
4. The gist of the complaint averments reveal that mobile telephone of the
The court established that bail can be granted even in serious cases if the evidence does not support the most severe charges and if the accused have no prior criminal history.
An accused charged with robbery may be granted bail if the investigation has concluded, a charge-sheet has been submitted, and the accused has been in custody for a significant period of time.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
