SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 716

S. R. KRISHNA KUMAR
Fakkirapa – Appellant
Versus
Nabisab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Iranagouda K. Kabbur, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. This writ petition is directed against the impugned order dtd. 27/1/2023 passed in O.S. No. 57/2012 by the Sr. Civil Judge & JMFC, Kalaghatagi, whereby the application filed by the respondent No.1-plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 CPC seeking amendment of the plaint was allowed by the trial Court.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record.

3. The material on record discloses that the respondent No.1/ plaintiff instituted the aforesaid suit O.S. No. 57/2012 for specific performance and other reliefs in relation to the suit schedule immovable property. In the said suit, initially respondents No.2 to 7 were arrayed as defendants and the suit having been partly decreed by the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 04. 07.2018, the respondents/ defendants preferred an appeal which was allowed by the first appellate Court and the matter remitted back to the trial Court for reconsideration afresh vide judgment dtd. 26/1/2021 passed in R.A. No. 176/2018. Subsequent to remand, the respondent No.1/plaintiff filed the instant application seeking amendment of the plaint by incorporating certain events that had transpired during th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top