SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 761

SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
K R Laxmidevi – Appellant
Versus
Bhima Rao – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P.V. Manjunatha, Advocate, Shekarappa B., Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. The captioned second appeal is filed by defendant No.4 feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the Appellate Court wherein Appellate Court has declined to grant share to the defendant No.4 on the premise that she was born in 1949 and that her marriage was solemnized much prior to amendment to Sec. 6(A) of Hindu Succession Act. Consequently, 1/5th share granted by the trial Court is reversed thereby declining share to defendant No.4.

2. For the sake of brevity, the parties are referred to as per their rank before the trial Court.

3. The family tree is as under:

4. One K.R.Sridhar who is the son of Gangamma and Rangappa Jois filed a suit for partition and separate possession and said suit was decreed granting 1/5th share to the plaintiff and 1/5th share to the defendants. Under the preliminary decree, the trial Court has granted 1/5th share to defendant No.4. The Appellate Court, however, while entertaining the appeal filed by defendant Nos.1 and 3 has allowed the appeal in part declining to grant share to the defendant No.4 on the premise that she was born in 1949 and that her marriage was solemnized much prior to Karnataka amendment to Hindu Succession Act

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top