SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 765

H. P. SANDESH
S. Rudrappa – Appellant
Versus
B. K. Ramachandra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K. Sandeep, Advocate, Rajadithya Sadasivan, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. This matter is listed for admission. This Court heard the matter earlier and the learned counsel for the appellants sought time to place the citations before the Court. Accordingly, he has filed a memo with citations today before the Court.

2. This appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree dtd. 12/4/2022 passed in R.A.No.57/2015 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC., H.D.Kote.

3. The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff before the Trial Court is that the suit items are ancestral and joint family properties of himself and defendants. Hence, the plaintiff is entitled for share in the suit schedule properties and claimed the share on the ground that the defendants have refused to give share in respect of the suit schedule properties.

4. In pursuance of the suit summons, the second defendant took the contention in the written statement by virtue of paluparikath dtd. 30/3/1966, the plaintiff severed from the joint family and also contended that in addition to paluparikath, sale deed dtd. 26/5/1980 was executed in respect of item No.1 by her father. It is also contended that her father had executed Will in respect of item No.2 and this Court ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top