SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 777

C. M. POONACHA
Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Poojya – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vishwakarmaraj Nayak, Advocate, D.P.Ambekar, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. The above Second Appeal is filed by the Defendant to set aside the Judgment and Decree dtd. 8/12/2017 passed in R.A. No.76/2014 by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kalaburagi and the Judgment and Decree dtd. 31/10/2014 passed in O.S. No.327/2009 by the V Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC., Gulbarga.

2. The Parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court for the sake of convenience.

3. The Plaintiff instituted a suit in O.S. No.327/2009 against the Defendant for mandatory injunction or in the alternative for possession. It is the case of the Plaintiff that he is the absolute owner and landlord in respect of an open space bearing CTS No.1432 measuring 41593.4 sq.meters and that his name is entered in the CTS record; that in the said Jatra Maidan, the plaintiff's father constructed over head water tank and there is electricity and water connection to the said tank; that the Jatra of Sri Sharanabasaveshwara Sadu Maharaj held in the month of March or April every year and the Defendant had taken the suit premises as a licencee for a period of three months on a licence fee of Rs.12,000.00 and that the Defendant paid Rs.8,000.00 on 14/4/2008 out of the said R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top