SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 736

V. SRISHANANDA
K. H. Channabasappa – Appellant
Versus
K. H. Maheshwarappa – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.Vinaya Kerthy, Advocate, K.Sanath Kumar Shetty, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. Present appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dtd. 7/4/2006 passed in OS No.122/2004 on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Harihar, whereby the suit of the plaintiff is decreed as prayed for.

2. The parties are referred to as plaintiff and defendants for the sake of convenience as per their original rankings before the Trial Court.

3. Brief factual matrix of the case are as under: Plaintiff filed a suit seeking cancellation of the portion of the decree passed in OS No.28/2003 dtd. 23/10/2003, in respect of 'C' schedule property and as well as cancellation of the portion of the partition deed dtd. 15/12/2003 executed by late K.H. Parameshwarappa and defendants relating to the suit land of the plaintiff shown as 'A' schedule in the said partition deed which has been allotted to Parameshwarappa son of Channabasappa. Case of the plaintiff further reveals that plaintiff is the owner of the agricultural land bearing Survey No.493/B measuring 4 acres 83 cents situated at Hiremeghala gere village, Arasikere Hobli, Harappanahalli Sub-Division, Davangere District bounded on East - land belonging to B.Siddappa; West - land belonging to Gurappala Halamma; Nort

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top