SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 737

V. SRISHANANDA
M. Srinivasa Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.Subramanya, Advocate, Shivananda D.S., Advocate, P.V.Chandrashekar, Advocate, Shiva Rudra, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. The appeals are directed against the common judgment and decree dtd. 27/11/2003 passed in OS Nos.4930 and 4932 of 1996, by the XXVII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, whereby the suit of the plaintiffs came to be dismissed.

2. The parties are referred to as plaintiffs and defendants per their original rankings before the Trial Court.

3. The case of the plaintiffs in brief are as under:

By a grant order dtd. 29/6/1957, the landed property measuring 2 acres assessed at Rs.3.00 bearing Survey No.144 of Hoodi village Krishnaraja Pura Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk having boundaries on: East by Pattandur Agrahara boundary; West by Survey Nos.214, 213, 212 and 211; North by Portion of Survey No.144 owned by H.K. Subbaraju S/o. late Krishnamaraju and South by Survey No. 145 [hereinafter referred to as "suit property" for short] was granted in favour of the plaintiff being for upset price. Katha of the lands were mutated in the names of the plaintiffs and the same is reflected in the revenue records. Plaintiffs enjoyed the property by cultivating the said land and grown dry crops. They also paid required land revenue in respect of the granted land and lands were also p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top