M. I. ARUN
Sikandar, S/o. Sri Abdul Rehman Sab – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka, Represented By Its Secretary To Revenue Department – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The case of the petitioner is that he is the owner of 29 guntas of land in Survey No.196/1 (new Survey Nos.196/11 and 196/3), Amanikere village, Kasaba Hobli, Tumkur Taluk, Tumkur District. That he requested for a plan to be sanctioned for constructing a residential house on the said property. The said plan was sanctioned to him by an order dated 08.08.2012. However, as the authorities were intending to widen the road which was in front of the property of the petitioner, a condition was imposed on the petitioner that he should put up a compound after 75 feet from the centre of the road and thereafter put up construction in accordance with law. Subject to the said condition, the plan was sanctioned in favour of the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that subsequent to the said sanction, a portion of his property has been earmarked for formation of a road for which he has not been paid any compensation. For the said reason, he has made necessary representation to the respondents/authorities stating that his property should not be used without giving the necessary compensation and also has requested them to adopt due process of law in acquiring the said property.
2.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.