SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Kar) 81

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.I. ARUN, J.
Sri Sikandar, S/o. Sri Abdul Rehman Sab - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Karnataka, Represented By Its Secretary To Revenue Department and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No.677 of 2022 (LA-UDA)
Decided On : 14-02-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri Mohan S., Adv.
For the Respondents: Sri Naveen Chandrashekar, AGA, Sri Santhosh S. Nagarale, Smt. Shakshi M. Krishna for Sri R. Subramanya.

IMPORTANT POINT
Section 32(5) of the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 does not apply to single plot development, and the authorities are obligated to compensate the landowner for forming a road on his land.

Headnote:

Compensation - Land Acquisition - Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 - Section 32(5)

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner owns land which was earmarked for road formation without compensation. The petitioner sought compensation for the land used for road formation, but the respondent refused citing Section 32(5) of the Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that Section 32(5) of the Act does not apply to single plot development and that the authorities are required to compensate the petitioner for forming a road on his land.

Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation for the land used for road formation under Section 32(5) of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 32(5) of the Act and held that it applies to layout plans and not to single plot development. The court also emphasized that the authorities are obligated to compensate the petitioner for forming a road on his land.

Final Decision: Respondent nos.4 and 5 are directed to pass necessary award and compensate the petitioner for the land used/intended to be used for formation of the road.

ORDER :

1. The case of the petitioner is that he is the owner of 29 guntas of land in Survey No.196/1 (new Survey Nos.196/11 and 196/3), Amanikere village, Kasaba Hobli, Tumkur Taluk, Tumkur District. That he requested for a plan to be sanctioned for constructing a residential house on the said property. The said plan was sanctioned to him by an order dated 08.08.2012. However, as the authorities were intending to widen the road which was in front of the property of the petitioner, a condition was imposed on the petitioner that he should put up a compound after 75 feet from the centre of the road and thereafter put up construction in accordance with law. Subject to the said condition, the plan was sanctioned in favour of the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that subsequent to the said sanction, a portion of his property has been earmarked for formation of a road for which he has not been paid any compensation. For the said reason, he has made necessary representation to the respondents/authorities stating that his property should not be used without giving the necessary compensation and also has requested them to adopt due process of law in acquiring the said property.

2. Respondent no.3 in this regard has issued the impugned endorsement dated 20.09.2019 wherein it is stated that the request of the petitioner for grant of award has been submitted to the Government and as necessary instructions are not being received, his request has been kept in abeyance. As there was no further communication to the petitioner in this regard, the present writ petition is filed.

3. In the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has no objection to acquire that portion of his property which is required for the formation of the road and he limits his prayer to a direction to the authorities concerned for grant of compensation in respect of the land over which the road is intended to be formed.

4. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4 submits that in the light of Section 32(5) of the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 (for short 'the Act'), the petitioner is not entitled to any compensation for the land over which the road is being formed. The case of respondent no.4 is that any person who intends to form a layout is liable to surrender certain extent of land to the authorities concerned for formation of road, civic amenities, parks and the like and for that reason, he is not entitled to any compensation and in the instant case, the petitioner requested for sanction of plan for putting up a residential unit on 29 guntas of his land for which he is required to surrender a portion of his land for widening of the road and the plan has been sanctioned accordingly.

5. The question that arises for consideration in the instant writ petition is as under:

    "Whether as per Section 32(5) of the Act, the petitioner is required to forego a portion of his land for formation of the road without any compensation?"

6. As per the plan sanctioned, the condition imposed on the petitioner in respect of foregoing portion of his land for formation of the road is that as the road is being widened to 150 feet, the petitioner is required to put up a compound after a distance of 75 feet from the middle of the road. The plan sanctioned does not mention anything about the petitioner forfeiting his rights over the property on which the road is required to be formed. Section 32 of the Act deals with formation of new extension or layouts or making new private streets. Section 32(5) of the Act is enacted in this regard and it reads as under:

    "32. Formation of new extension or layouts or making new private streets.-

(1) xxx

(2) xxx

(3) xxx

(4) xxx

(5) The authority may require the applicant to deposit, before sanctioning the application, the sums necessary for meeting the expenditure for making roads, side-drains, culverts, underground drainage and water supply and lighting and the char

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top