ORDER :

Heard Smt.Pallavi Pachhapure on behalf of Sri.F.V.Patil, learned counsel for the revision petitioners and Sri.Sangram S Kulkarni and Sri.V.R.Datar, learned counsels for respondents.

2. Though this matter is listed before the Court as CRP No.1071/2010, material on record would go to show that since two orders were challenged it has been mentioned as two different numbers as CRP No.1071/2010 and CRP No.1073/2010. Hence, both the revision petitions are taken up for disposal.

3. Present revision petitions are filed challenging the order passed in Misc. No.43/1998 and Misc. No.26/2002 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gokak dated 21.12.2009.

4. Brief facts of the case are as under:

4.1 Original Suits in O.S.No.60/1994 and O.S.No.61/1994 were filed seeking declaration that plaintiffs are the owners of suit properties and for consequential relief of injunction.

4.2 Suits were ended in a compromise by filing an application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure in both the suits. Said compromise was accepted by the learned trial Judge.

4.3 After lapse of sufficient time, in the year 1998 and in the year 2002, defendants filed applications seeki