SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3227

R. VIJAYAKUMAR
Gandhi Meenal – Appellant
Versus
Jothi Muthuramalingam – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:J. Anandhavalli, Advocate.For the Respondnets:R1 & R4, H. Lakshmi Shankar, Advocate. R2, R3, R5 to R10, No appearance.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Revision Case is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order dated 04.10.2013 passed in I.A.No.192 of 2011 in O.S.No.161 of 1979 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Paramakudi and allow the present Civil Revision Petition.)

1. The plaintiff in O.S.No.161 of 1979 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Ramnad is the revision petitioner. The revision petition has been filed challenging the dismissal of an application made by the plaintiff under Sections 151 and 152 of C.P.C for amending the memo of compromise entered into between the parties on 20.11.1985.

(A).Facts leading to the filing of this revision are as follows:

2. The revision petition herein as plaintiff had filed O.S.No161 of 1979 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Ramnad at Madurai as against 33 defendants for the following reliefs.

(a)declaring the petitioner/plaintiff as pauper;

(b)directing the defendants to deliver possession of the suit properties to the plaintiff free from any obstruction of the defendants, their agents, men and servants and other persons claiming under them;

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top