Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Ramesh S/o. Venkataramana Hegde – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction by issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to regularize the service of the petitioner in the 4th respondent-Gram Panchayat in the cadre of Attender cum Bill Collector with effect from 10.01.1994, as also the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.112917/2014.
2. Heard Ms.Vaibhavi Inamdar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Smt.Girija S.Hiremath, learned HCGP appearing for respondent No.1 and Sri.Vishwanath Hegde, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4.
3. Facts in brief, germane, are as follows:
(a) The petitioner joins the service of the 4th respondent-Gram Panchayat as an Attender cum Bill Collector with a consolidated pay fixed at Rs.500/- by the 4th respondent- Gram Panchayat. The petitioner since then has been working on continuous basis. This fact is not in dispute. On 22.09.2006, a Resolution comes to be passed by the 4th respondent-Gram Panchayat increasing monthly salary of the petitioner- consolidated pay from Rs.500/- to Rs.800/-. Again the salary from Rs.800/- was increased to Rs.1,200/- in terms of another Resolut
Long-term employees engaged in continuous service are entitled to regularization and benefits even post-retirement if their claims remain pending during their service, subject to compliance with appl....
Long-term employees performing essential and continuous functions may claim regularization after a decade of service, despite previous procedural irregularities.
Regularization of employees with irregular appointments who have served for a significant duration is constitutionally mandated when they fulfill essential duties, emphasizing equity and justice in p....
Regularization of long-serving daily wage employees is mandated after 10 years of service, acknowledging functional continuity despite initial irregularities, violating constitutional rights otherwis....
Long-standing service without a formal appointment does not deny employees the right to regularization; discriminatory treatment of similarly situated employees violates principles of equity and fair....
The court reaffirmed that long-serving employees, despite irregular appointments, are entitled to regularization, emphasizing the importance of continuity of service without considering minor lapses ....
Long-standing service and fulfillment of criteria establish entitlement for regularization under service law, preventing arbitrary denial of rights.
Long-term employees, fulfilling essential duties, are entitled to regularization after 10 years of service despite irregular appointments, emphasizing fairness and preventing exploitation.
Long-serving employees in essential roles are entitled to consideration for regularization despite initial irregular appointments, ensuring fairness and adherence to constitutional principles.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
