Back
V. SRISHANANDA
Commissioner Bangalore Development Authority T. Chowdaiah Road Bangalore – Appellant
Versus
S Venkatarama Reddy S/o Srinivasa Reddy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validity of the appeal process initiated by the commissioner bda. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. ownership and acquisition notifications affecting the plaintiffs' property. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. conversion application processes for the property. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. evidence and proceedings related to the plaintiffs' possession and acquisition. (Para 9 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. arguments surrounding the validity of the bda's actions. (Para 17 , 20 , 22) |
| 6. application of doctrines like estoppel in dispute resolution. (Para 43 , 48 , 51) |
| 7. duty of statutory bodies in litigation and consequences of their actions. (Para 68 , 76) |
| 8. final decision on appeal with imposition of costs. (Para 79) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The defendant, Commissioner, Bengaluru Development Authority, [hereinafter referred to as the 'BDA' for short] has challenged the validity of the judgment and decree passed in OS No.10158/2005 dated 10.08.2011 on the file of the XL Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, in this appeal.
2. The parties are referred to as plaintiffs and defendant for the sake of convenience as per their original ranking before the Trial Court.
3. Shorn of unnecessary details, factual matrix of the case on hand reveals as under:
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
