V. SRISHANANDA
Commissioner Bangalore Development Authority T. Chowdaiah Road Bangalore – Appellant
Versus
S Venkatarama Reddy S/o Srinivasa Reddy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The defendant, Commissioner, Bengaluru Development Authority, [hereinafter referred to as the 'BDA' for short] has challenged the validity of the judgment and decree passed in OS No.10158/2005 dated 10.08.2011 on the file of the XL Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, in this appeal.
2. The parties are referred to as plaintiffs and defendant for the sake of convenience as per their original ranking before the Trial Court.
3. Shorn of unnecessary details, factual matrix of the case on hand reveals as under:
P.K.Kalburqi vs. State of Karnataka and Others reported in (2005) 12 SCC 489
Prahlad Singh and Others Vs. Union of India and Others reported in (2011) 5 SCC 386
Puran Singh and Others Vs. The State of Punjab in (1975) 4 SCC 518
Rame Gowda (Dead) by LRs. Vs. M.Varadappa Naidu (Dead) by LRs and Another in (2004) 1 SCC 769
Ramesh Chand Ardawatiya v. Anil Panjwani (2003) 7 SCC 350
Lallu Yeshwant Singh v. Rao Jagdish Singh
Nair Service Society Ltd. v. K.C. Alexander
M.C. Chockalingam v. V. Manickavasagam (1974) 1 SCC 48
Krishna Ram Mahale v. Shobha Venkat Rao (1989) 4 SCC 131
Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of U.P., (1979) 2 SCC 409 : 1979 SCC: (Tax) 144
Augustan Textile Colours Ltd, v. Director of Industries
BALCO Employees’ Union v. Union of India reported in (2002) 2 SCC 333
Vinod Seth Vs. Devinder Bajaj reported in (2010) 8 SCC 1
Ashok Kumar Mittal Vs. Ram Kumar Gupta reported in (2009) 2 SCC 656 : (2009) 1 SCC (Cri) 836
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.