SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Kar) 222

ANIL B. KATTI
Mahantesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Anilkumar H.Budarpur, Advocate, Girija S.Hiremath, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Petitioner/ accused filed the present petition U/s 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in connection with the case registered in Kundagol P.S. Crime No. 98/2022.

2. Parties to the petition are referred with their ranks as assigned in the trial Court, for the sake of convenience.

3. Heard the arguments of both sides.

4. After hearing arguments of both sides and on perusal of the records, the following points arise for consideration.

    i) Whether petitioner /accused is entitled for grant of bail in terms of Sec. 439 of Cr.P.C.?

ii) What order?

5. On the strength of the complaint filed by Mahantesh son of Dilleppa Havanur criminal law was set into motion by registering the case in Kundagol P.S. Crime No. 98/2022 for the offences punishable U/s 302, 354A, 506 r/w 34 of IPC. The investigating officer after conducting investigation has filed the charge sheet. The accused is in judicial custody from the date of his arrest on 19/8/2023.

6. The complaint allegations would go to show that his step- sister Sunanda was given in marriage with Manjunath Fakirappa Menasinakai and out of wedlock they have two children by name Niranjan, 17 years and Naveen, 15 years. There was propert

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top