SATYEN VAIDYA
Yuvraj Singh Jadeja – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Satyen Vaidya, J.
By way of instant petition, petitioner has prayed for grant of bail in case FIR No. 93 of 2022, dated 13.8.2022, under Sections 302, 120-B and 201 of IPC, registered at Police Station, Keylong, District Lahaul Spiti, H.P.
2. Petitioner was arrested on 03.09.2022. He remained in police custody till 14.9.2022 in the first instance and thereafter from 16.9.2022 to 19.9.2022. Petitioner is in judicial custody since 19.9.2022.
3. Brief facts necessary for adjudication of the petition are that the petitioner was married to Ms. Nidhiba (now deceased) on 05.02.2022 in Ahmedabad. Petitioner and his wife (deceased Ms. Nidhiba) undertook a pleasure trip to Leh-Ladakh in the month of July, 2022 through a Travel Agency named “Zoyo Trip Holidays” (a unit of Manali-Leh Adventure). On return journey, they halted at a place named “Jispa” in Lahaul-Spiti District, Himachal Pradesh. The travel agent had booked their stay in Himalayan Spirit Camp, Jispa, which had “tented” accommodation. Petitioner and deceased stayed in a tent, which was pitched near to the ‘Bhaga River’. During mid-night, the body of Ms. Nidhiba was found, half floating in ‘Bhaga River’ with her left leg str
Prasanta Kumar Sarkar vs. Ashis Chatterjee and another (2010) 14 SCC 496
Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (2012) 1 SCC 40
Manoranjana Sinh alias Gupta vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (2017) 5 SCC 218
Dataram Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another (2018) 3 SCC 22
Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons, In re
Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India (2018) 11 SCC 1
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 565
Ramesh Bhavan Rathod vs. Vishanbhai Hirabhai Makwana (Koli) and another (2021) 6 SCC 230
Ram Govind Upadhyay v. Sudarshan Singh (2002) 3 SCC 598
Grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the exception.
The court upheld the principle that bail should not be denied as pre-trial punishment, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for careful assessment of potential flight risk and witnes....
Pre-trial incarceration cannot be ordered as a matter of rule.
In dowry death cases, courts must exercise heightened vigilance, considering the broader societal impact and the specific link between cruelty and the death, often necessitating the denial of bail to....
Detention in custody of under-trial prisoners for an indefinite period would amount to violation of Article 21 of Constitution.
Gravity alone cannot be a decisive ground to deny bail, rather competing factors are required to be balanced by court while exercising its discretion.
The presumption of innocence, the right to liberty, and the need to secure the presence of the accused for trial were central legal principles established in the judgment.
(1) Bail – Object of bail is neither punitive nor preventative – Deprivation of liberty must be considered a punishment, unless it is required to ensure that accused person will stand his trial when ....
The main legal point established is the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, and the need to avoid undue hardship from detentio....
Pushing a person causing fall and death from head injury does not prima facie constitute offence under Section 103(1) without attributable knowledge of likely death; bail granted as added sections ba....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.