H. P. SANDESH
S. Subramani – Appellant
Versus
Gangalakshamamma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
H.P. Sandesh, J.
This matter is listed for admission and I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff before the Trial Court is that plaintiff is the owner of the site No.12 situated in Sy.No.111 of Shivanapura Village by virtue of an agreement of sale dated 29.01.1994. The defendant by an agreement of sale, agreed to sell the suit schedule property for a sum of Rs.7,500/- and the plaintiff has paid the entire sale consideration amount to the defendant No.1 and she put him in possession of the suit schedule property. The defendant No.1 has agreed to sell the same contending that by virtue of a partition entered into among the members of her family dated 08.06.1969, the defendant No.1 was allotted 1 acre, 1 gunta of land in Sy.No.111. As per the partition, the property mutated in M.R.No.2/92-93 and number of sites, out of which the site No.12 was agreed to be sold in favour of the plaintiff. The defendant No.1 was in need of money for their family necessity and daughter marriage and in view of the ban imposed by the Government of Karnataka, the document is not registered. The plaintiff constantly requesting to execute t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.