SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2434

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
H.P.SANDESH
Guruswamy, S/o Late Puttamadaiah – Appellant
Versus
Gopamma, W/o Honnaiah – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Smt. Kavitha D., Advocate

JUDGMENT :

H.P.SANDESH, J.

1. This matter is listed for admission. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants.

2. This second appeal is filed against the concurrent finding. The factual matrix of case of the plaintiff while seeking the relief of permanent injunction in O.S.No.392/2013 that plaintiff is the absolute owner of the suit schedule property bearing Katha No.71 measuring East to West 45 feet, North to South 30 feet is the vacant site wherein Mangalore tiled house situated in the extent of 12½ x 20 feet. The boundary is also disclosed in respect of the same and the same was purchased by the plaintiff through registered sale deed dated 06.10.1994 for sale consideration of Rs.8,000/- from one Hanumanthaiah, the said vendor of the plaintiff had purchased the suit schedule property through registered sale deed dated 29.05.1987 from one Ramesh. Having purchased the property, all the revenue records are standing in the name of the plaintiff. The defendant without title, right or interest over the suit schedule property, causing obstructions to the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property and hence, filed the suit. In pursuance of the suit summons, defendant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top