IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J.
Sri.Kailash Ashrama Mahasamsthana Trust - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Karnataka - Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 1570 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 4118 OF 2025 (LB-BMP), WRIT PETITION NO. 4238 OF 2025 (LB-BMP), WRIT PETITION NO. 4787 OF 2025 (LB-BMP), WRIT PETITION NO. 5383 OF 2025 (LB-BMP), WRIT PETITION NO. 6002 OF 2025 (LB-BMP)
Decided on : 16-06-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek quashing of various legislative and administrative actions. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. previous rulings impact current case with substantial overlap in legal reasoning. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. certain provisions and fees deemed illegal, affecting smaller development projects. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. writ petitions allowed, directing issuance of building approvals. (Para 12) |
ORDER :
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J.
The petitioner in W.P.No.1570/2025 is seeking for the following reliefs;
"i) Grant an order declaring that the entire Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No. 01 of 2022) notified on 13/01/2022 (Annexure-R) as being ultra vires the constitution WP No. 4238 of 2025 HC-KAR AND 3 OTHERS in so far, petitioner is concerned in so far, the petitioner is concerned.
ii) To declare that Karnataka Municipal Corporations And Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No. 01 of 2022) notified on 13/01/2022 (Annexure-R) is in violation/contrary to the decision of this Hon'ble Court in W.P No.4601/2020 (LB-BMP) which is at Annexure-P.
iii) Grant an order, direction or writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the office order no. HaNiNaYo/PR/461/2021-22 dated 09/03/2022 issued by Respondent No.3 as (Annexure-S) in so far, the Petitioner is concerned.
iv) Grant an order, direction or writ in the nature of certiorari quashing Section 18 -A of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 brought into effect by Karnataka Act No. 23 of 2004 (Karnataka Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Act, 1998) as contained in (Annexure-K) insofar as Section 18 -A(i) and (iv) of the Karnataka Act No. 23 of 2004 is concerned.
v) Grant an order, direction or writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the notification issued by the 1st respondent bearing No.UDD 3 TTP 2015 dated 25/02/2020 as contained in (Annexure-J) insofar as the inserted Rule 37-A and 37-C is concerned.
vi) Issue a writ or order by way of certiorari quashing the circular dated 14/08/2020, bearing No. He.Ni.Ka.Pa.Ko/ P.R/320/2020-21 issued by the Respondent No.3 (Annexure-L) in so far the petitioner is concerned.
vii) Grant an order, direction or writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the notification issued by the 1st respondent bearing no. UDD 23 TTP 2020 (E) dated 21/06/2021 as contained in (Annexure-M) insofar as the inserted Rule 37-A and 37-C is concerned
viii) Issue a writ or order by way of certiorari quashing the circular dated 24/06/2021, bearing No. He.Ni.Na.Yo/P.R/320/2020-21 issued by the Respondent No.3 (Annexure-N) in so far the petitioner is concerned.
ix) To declare that the entire Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2023 notified on 16/08/2024 vide Notification bearing No.DPAL 36 Shasana 2023, Bengaluru issued by the Respondent No.2 (Annexure-T1) as being ultra vires the constitution of India.
x) Issue a writ or order by way of certiorari quashing the demand notice dated 27/11/2024, bearing No.BBMP/ Ad.COM/WST/0613/24-25, issued by the respondent No.4 (Annexure-D) for demanding in so far it is concerned to Ground rent, GST on Ground rent, License fee, scrutiny fee, Betterment charges for building, Betterment charges for site, security deposit, Lake Rejuvenation fee, cess for water supply scheme, surcharge for formation outer ring road, cess for improvement of slum, labour cess and etc., as illegal, without jurisdiction and arbitrary.
xi) Issue a writ or order or direction by way of mandamus directing the Respondent No.3 and 4 BBMP to issue the sanction plan for construction of the building in the Schedule Property without insisting the Ground rent, GST on Ground rent, License fee, scrutiny fee, Betterment charges for building, Betterment charges for site security deposit, lake rejuvenation fee, cess for water supply scheme, surcharge for formation outer ring road, cess for improvement of slum and surcharge for mass rapid transport system, labour ces
The Court declared the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Amendment Act, 2021 and related demands unconstitutional, emphasizing the illegality of fee linkage to market value and ensuring no double char....
The court quashed the unconstitutional amendments, declaring prior fees as sufficient for development plans, prohibiting additional charges linked to market value.
The court affirmed that provisions imposing fees on smaller plots and linking them to market value are illegal, ensuring adherence to prior authoritative rulings.
The court held the amendments concerning municipal corporations illegal, reaffirming judicial precedent on land fee structures and their applicability only to larger development proposals.
The court declared certain municipal amendment acts unconstitutional and quashed illegal fees imposed based on market value linkage, affirming prior judicial precedents.
The High Court quashed amendments deemed unconstitutional, establishing fees for development plans apply only to larger plots and declaring prior fee collections prevent new levies.
The court confirmed that municipal amendments are unconstitutional if they conflict with prior judicial rulings and declared illegal the imposition of certain fees associated with development plannin....
The amendments to the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Town Planning acts involving fee levies are unconstitutional and only applicable to larger plots, prohibiting duplicate fees for changes in ....
The amendments to municipal laws were declared illegal, and prior fees associated with development plans for smaller plots were deemed unenforceable, following a coordinate bench ruling.
Court emphasized the necessity for authorities to comply with judicial orders or face contempt proceedings for non-compliance, reinforcing the rule of law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.