SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 1282

ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
Shantinath – Appellant
Versus
Mahaveer – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Mrutyunjay Tata Bangi, Advocate,
For the Respondent:Sri. Shivaraj S Balloli, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Mr. Anant Ramanath Hegde, J. - Defendants No.1 to 4 who are the Class-I heirs of late Rayappa Topannavar are before this Court aggrieved by the decree for declaration of title in favour of the plaintiff in O.S.No.35/2011 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Saundatti.

2. To understand the case in a proper perspective, it is necessary to refer to the admitted genealogy of the parties, which is as under:

3. The trial Court accepted the plea of the plaintiff who claimed absolute right over the suit schedule property bearing Sy.No.383 measuring 13 acres 33 guntas in Yaraganavi village of Saundatti Taluk based on the Will dated 07.05.1996 alleged to have been executed by Rayappa Topannavar, the father of the plaintiff.

4. The testator Rayappa Topannavar died on 26.08.2003. The first wife was Tavanavva and second wife is also Tavanavva. He married the second wife after the demise of first wife. From the first wife he had three sons and one daughter and from the second wife he had two sons and two daughters. The plaintiff claims that the children from the second wife were residing separately and he was looking after his father and on account of love and affection towards father

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top