Back
PRASANNA B. VARALE, ASHOK S. KINAGI
Toyota Kirloskar Motor Employees Union (R) – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ashok S. Kinagi, J.
1. This intra-court appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Courts Act challenging the order dated 16.12.2022, passed in W.P. No. 5127/2022 by the learned Single Judge.
2. Brief facts leading rise to filing of this appeal are as under:
Point of law: If the Registrar is satisfied that the certificate is obtained by fraud or mistake or the Union has ceased to exist, is not the circumstance here and further has willfully and after not....
The court ruled that disputes regarding the signing of Form-J by trade union officers are factual and not suitable for resolution under Article 226, directing such matters to Civil Court.
The court upheld the dismissal of an amendment application in industrial dispute proceedings, ruling that proposed changes were repetitive and did not introduce new claims, affirming the Labour Court....
The principle of natural justice, including the right to be heard and reasoned decision-making, influenced the court's decision in setting aside the non-speaking cancellation order.
Termination from service - Misconduct – As per provisions of ID Act at a time when Union had continued to enjoy its corporate body status cannot be said to be in any manner vitiated merely because Un....
An appeal under Section 11 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 is maintainable only against refusal of registration or cancellation of registration, not against a refusal to cancel.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
