Back
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay S.Agrawal, J
Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Congres – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwat Prasad Dubey S/o Shri Ram Kumar Dubey – Respondent
Order :
(Sanjay S. Agrawal, J.)
1. By virtue of this petition, the petitioners are questioning the legality and propriety of the order dated 18.01.20=9, whereby, the learned Member Judge, State Industrial Court, Bench at Bilaspur (CG) in Case No.02/ITU Act/I/2018, has partly allowed the appeal (Annexure P/15) preferred by Respondent No.1- Bhagwat Prasad Dubey under Section 11(aa) of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act, 1926”) by setting aside the order dated 24.03.2018 (Annexure P-14) passed by Respondent No.2- The Registrar, Trade Union, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, by remanding the matter to the said authority for adjudication of the case afresh.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the two registered Trade Unions known as ‘Rashtriya Colliery Workers Federation’ (for short “RCWF”) and ‘Rashtriya Koyala Khadan Mazdoor Sangh’ (for short “RKKMS”) through its Managing Directors, have submitted an application (Annexure P/2) on 27.08.2003 before the Registrar, Trade Union, Chhattisgarh, Raipur as per the provisions prescribed under Sections 24 and 25 of the Act, 1926 for amalgamation of the said Unions to that of ‘Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Congress’ (for
An appeal under Section 11 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 is maintainable only against refusal of registration or cancellation of registration, not against a refusal to cancel.
Mixed questions of law and fact in labor disputes should be resolved during final hearings, not as preliminary issues.
Point of law: If the Registrar is satisfied that the certificate is obtained by fraud or mistake or the Union has ceased to exist, is not the circumstance here and further has willfully and after not....
The principle of natural justice, including the right to be heard and reasoned decision-making, influenced the court's decision in setting aside the non-speaking cancellation order.
Termination from service - Misconduct – As per provisions of ID Act at a time when Union had continued to enjoy its corporate body status cannot be said to be in any manner vitiated merely because Un....
The court upheld the dismissal of an amendment application in industrial dispute proceedings, ruling that proposed changes were repetitive and did not introduce new claims, affirming the Labour Court....
Only registered trade unions are authorized to represent their members according to Section 2(qq) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, invalidating any representations made by unregistered unions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
