SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 1384

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
C.M. Poonacha, J.
Arpee Electrical Pvt Ltd - Petitioner
Versus
Chief General Manager (Elec) Operations Bescom – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 3412 of 2020 (GM-KEB)
Decided On : 04-01-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Sri R P Gupta, Advocate (Party-In-Person).
Smt Sumana Naganand, Advocate.

Headnote:(A) Electricity Act, 2003 - Writ of Mandamus - Claim for refund of deposit and accrued interest - Petitioner, a Small Scale Industrial Unit, sought compounding interest on a deposit made for electricity connection, which was previously regulated by KERC orders - The Petitioner alleged that all prior orders were a nullity due to fraud. (Paras 2, 12, 19)

(B) Principles of Interest - No legal basis for compounding interest of 2% per month was established; the Writ Petition was dismissed as not maintaining a specific contract or obligation for such payment. (Paras 19, 20)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner paid a deposit for an electricity connection in 1987, followed by various proceedings seeking the refund with interest, eventually receiving the deposit without interest in 2007.

Findings of Court:
The various orders of courts and tribunals were upheld, rejecting the Petitioner's claims for compounded interest and fraudulent misrepresentation of past rulings.

Issues: Whether the relief sought for in Writ Petition is justifiable based on earlier proceedings and claims for interest.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that prior legal decisions regarding the refund and interest were valid; thus, further claims lacked merit and were dismissed.

Result: Writ Petition is rejected.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks writ for interest payment (Para 1 , 2)
2. history of petitioner's deposit and refunds (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. respondent's objection to petitioner's claims (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court's consideration of submissions (Para 10 , 11)
5. legal background of previous orders (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
6. dismissal of review petitions (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
7. court's refusal to initiate contempt proceedings (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
8. writ petition rejected (Para 21)

ORDER :

C.M. Poonacha, J.

The Petitioner is represented by its Managing Director who has appeared in person and is aged more than 80 years.

2. The above Writ Petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

    "a) To admit the Writ Petition in the interest of justice and equity as justice should be seen to have been done.

    b) Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent to pay accrued interest of Rs.19,15,97,891/- as on 31.01.2018 and to pay 2% p.m., compound interest from 01.02.2018 till the entire amount is paid which is strictly based on facts and in accordance to law which are not in dispute.

    c) To pass any other order or directions that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the interest of justice."

3. It is the case of the Petitioner that, it is a Small Scale Industrial Unit in plot bearing No.A-56, Peenya, Bengaluru, started in the year 1978-79. That he made an application to the erstwhile Karnataka Electricity Board (KEB) presently Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) (hereinafter referred to as the 'Respondent') on 28.5.1987 for 200 KVA of electricity to establish a new industrial unit. Pursuant to which, as demanded by the Respondent, he paid deposit of a total sum of Rs.1,78,292/-. Thereafter, on 25.5.1991, he addressed a letter to the competent authority to permit installation of 2 diesel generator sets of 100KVA each to start production since no power connection has been given by the Respondent. That in the year 1992-93, he addressed various letters to the Respondent to refund the amount deposited with interest.

4. Despite the same, since the Respondent had not refunded the amount deposited, on 30.1.2003 he had filed a petition before the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commissioner (KERC) in OP.No.32/2003. On 8.1.2004, the KERC passed an order for refund of the deposit after deducting 10% of the deposited amount and pay interest at 6% pa., as against the compound interest claimed by the Petitioner at 2% pm. On 31.1.2004, the Petitioner filed a Review Petition No.4/2004 before the KERC seeking for compounded interest at 2% pm. On 9.3.2004, the Respondent filed WP.No.10168/2004 before this Court challenging the order dated 8.1.2004 passed by the KERC. Pursuant to the interim order dated 29.3.2004, passed by this Court in WP.No.10168/2004, the Respondent deposited a sum of Rs.1,78,292/- on 21.4.2004 before this Court. The Review Petition No.4/2004 was disposed off by the KERC in view of the interim order dated 29.3.2004 passed by this Court. On 16.11.2006, this Court dismissed the Writ Petition directing the Respondent to avail the alternate remedy under the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Electricity Act'), pursuant to which, the Respondent filed Appeal No.47/2007 before the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL). The Petitioner entered appearance in the said proceedings. On 16.5.2007, the APTEL passed an order by consent of the Respondent as well as the Petitioner, whereunder the Petitioner was permitted to withdraw the sum of Rs.1,78,292/- deposited by the Respondent before the High Court and disposed off the said appeal.

5. Pursuant to the order dated 16.5.2007, the Petitioner vide letter dated 29.5.2007 sought permission of the Respondent to withdraw the deposit of Rs.1,78,292/- with interest in this Court, under protest. The said letter was replied by the Respondent, vide letter dated 20.6.2007 and accordingly, the Petitioner received the sum of Rs.1,78,292/- deposited before th

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top