SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 161

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
H.P.SANDESH
Mansoor Nazeer S/o Late Nazeer Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
H R Rehaman S/o Abdul Nafeez – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :SRI RAMESH K R, ADVOCATE

JUDGMENT :

H.P.SANDESH, J.

This appeal is listed for admission. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. This appeal is filed against the concurrent finding of the Trial Court as well as the First Appellate Court.

2. The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff before the Trial Court that the defendant entered into an agreement of sale dated 04.10.2007 agreeing to execute the sale deed for sale consideration of Rs.6,50,000/- and as on the date of agreement, he has received an amount of Rs.1,01,000/- and agreed to pay the remaining amount within three months subject to furnishing of the documents for registration by the defendant and also he has to clear the bank loan and he will come forward to execute the sale deed for him or any nominee and inspite of providing the documents, he took additional amount of Rs.50,000/- on 25.10.2007 as well as an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- on 04.11.2007 and in all he has received an amount of Rs.2,51,000/- but the defendant did not come forward to execute the sale deed, hence, legal notice was issued and when he did not execute the sale deed, filed the suit for the relief of specific performance based on the sale agreement dated

3. The Trial Court h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top