Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
J.M.KHAZI
C. Prakash Somayaji S/o Late Krishna Somayaji – Appellant
Versus
R. Ravi S/o S.K. Ramachandran – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on dishonored cheque (Para 1 , 3 , 8) |
| 2. arguments against validity of cheque (Para 10 , 11 , 19) |
| 3. presumption of cheque validity (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. burden of proof on accused (Para 16 , 17 , 26) |
| 5. arguments regarding evidence and transaction validity. (Para 18) |
| 6. assessment of cheque validity and legal standards. (Para 20) |
| 7. exploration of material alterations and legal implications. (Para 22) |
| 8. decision to allow petition and acquit accused (Para 27) |
ORDER :
1. In this Criminal Revision Petition, petitioner who is arraigned as accused has challenged his conviction and sentence imposed by the trial Court for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act ('N.I. Act' for short), which came to be confirmed by the Sessions Court by dismissing the appeal filed by him.
2. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to by their ranks before the trial Court.
3. Complainant filed a complaint against accused contending that he is a manufacturer of Urea Formaldehyde raisin at Mysuru. Accused used to purchase the said product for his business of manufacturing of plywood and black board, etc. Towards discharge of a sum of Rs. 8,5
The transaction related to the dishonoured cheque was barred by limitation, resulting in the acquittal of the accused for the offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The presumption of consideration under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act applies once a cheque's issuance is admitted, shifting the burden to the accused to rebut this presumptio....
The presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act regarding the issuance of a cheque remains unless rebutted by the accused, and failure to provide any evidence leads to conviction.
The complainant must prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt for a successful prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The presumption of issuance of a cheque in discharge of a debt under Section 139 of the N.I. Act is rebuttable, placing the burden on the accused to prove otherwise, with convictions upheld when the ....
Under the Negotiable Instruments Act, issuance of a cheque creates a presumption of a legally enforceable debt, and the burden lies on the accused to disprove this, which was not done.
The presumption of liability under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act applies when a cheque's signature is admitted, unless expressly rebutted.
The presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act favors the complainant, requiring the accused to rebut the presumption of debt, which he failed to do.
The main legal point established is the significance of the presumption under Sec. 139 of the N.I. Act and the accused's burden to raise a probable defence to rebut the presumption.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
