Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.Nagaprasanna
G-Corp Spaces Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sumitra Ghosh, S/O Mr.Sunil Kumar Ghosh – Respondent
ORDER :
M. Nagaprasanna, J.
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question an order of the concerned Court which rejects the application filed by the petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 (a) and (d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ('the CPC' for short) seeking rejection of the plaint.
2. Heard Shri K. R. Krishnamurthy learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Shri Suraj Sampath, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.1 and 2.
3. The petitioner is the developer, respondents No.1 and 2, a home buyers. On certain agreements are entered into between the petitioner and respondents No.1 and 2 with regard to purchase of the apartment along with the car park. It transpires that after usage of the car park space for about two years, the developer is wanting to construct a multi level car parking over and above the car park allotted to the plaintiffs and is said to have allotted the same to other purchasers of car park. On the said score, respondents No.1 and 2 - plaintiffs approaches the concerned Court in O.S.No.6775/2023 seeking permanent injunction against the petitioner-defendant before the concerned Court in respect to the schedule property. In the aforesaid OS, th
Home buyers can maintain a suit for injunction against developers for non-structural grievances despite potential jurisdictional claims under real estate regulations.
The court ruled that the Trial Court improperly rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11, emphasizing that only the plaint's averments should be considered, not the defendants' defenses.
The civil court retains jurisdiction over injunction suits concerning leased non-agricultural lands, and under applicable statutes, a plaint cannot be rejected partially but must be considered as a w....
Civil courts lack jurisdiction over agricultural land disputes when a revenue suit is pending, and merits cannot be evaluated at the application stage under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
The RERA Act excludes Civil Court jurisdiction for disputes covered under its provisions, rendering any injunction by the Civil Court a nullity.
The main legal point established is that the Trial Court can exercise the power under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC at any stage of the suit and the averments in the plaint are crucial for deciding su....
A plaint cannot be rejected at the threshold if it discloses a cause of action, and amendments that do not change the nature of the suit are permissible.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
