Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. NAGAPRASANNA
Varun G.A., S/o. G.C. Ananda – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka, Represented By Hebbagodi Police Station By State Public Prosecutor High Court Of Karnataka Bengaluru – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the case and relationship. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments surrounding abetting suicide. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on facts and evidence. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. final order rejecting the petition. (Para 12) |
ORDER :
(M. NAGAPRASANNA, J.)
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.3016 of 2024 pending before the IV Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) and JMFC, Anekal, Bengaluru Rural District arising out of crime in Crime No.752 of 2023 registered for offences punishable under Section 306 of the IPC and Sections 66E and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2008 (‘the Act’ for short).
2. The skeletal facts, though tragic in their unfolding, are as follows:-
The petitioner and the daughter of the complainant are said to be classmates in P.E.S. Engineering College, Mandya and the daughter of the complainant then began to work as a Business Analyst in MERK Company at Bangalore and was residing in a particular apartment for 1½ years prior to the date of registration of the complaint. The daughter of the complainant was said to be living alone for close to one year. A complaint comes to be registered against th
The relationship between the accused and the deceased, alongside alleged financial manipulation, establishes prima facie grounds for abetment to suicide under Sections 306 IPC and related IT Act prov....
Abetment to suicide under IPC Sections 306 and 498A necessitates proof of instigation or influencing behavior, requiring thorough examination in trial; mere allegations do not suffice.
1. At the stage when the High Court considers a petition for quashing under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C, the test to be applied is whether the allegations in the complaint as they stand, without adding....
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, evidence of instigation or encouragement by the accused is essential; mere emotional turmoil does not suffice.
Denial of marriage does not constitute abetment of suicide under IPC without clear evidence of instigation or aiding the act.
Section 306 of IPC reads as abetment of suicide.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the scope and ambit of Section 107 IPC and its correlation with Section 306 IPC were discussed, emphasizing the need for direct or indirect ac....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that mere harassment without positive action would not amount to an offence under Section 306 IPC, emphasizing the need for active instigation or f....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
