JUDGMENT :

Neeraj Tiwari, J.

1. Heard Sri Anoop Trivedi, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri Om Narayan Tripathi and Sri Abhinav Gaur, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and Sri Vikram Bahadur Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.2.

2. Sri Vikram Bahadur Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 informed that during the pendency of this application, opposite party no. 2 died, therefore, he may be permitted to implead his wife as opposite party no. 2 in the capacity of victim for which learned counsel for the applicant has no objection.

3. Accordingly, Sri Vikram Bahadur Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 is permitted to implead “Sheela Pandey” as opposite party no. 2 after deleting the name of Ashok Kumar Pandey in the array of opposite party no. 2 during the course of the day.

4. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 29.06.2016 as well as entire proceeding of Case No. 3522 of 2016, arising out of case crime no. 1 16, under Section 306 I.P.C. read with Section 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Bhelu Pur, District Varanasi, pending before A.C.J.M., Court No. III, Varanasi.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant submitte