IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
Suraj Govindaraj, J.
Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Limited - Petitioner
Versus
The Special Land Acquisition Officer And Ors.- Respondents
Writ Petition No. 100706 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 100224 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 100227 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 100229 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 100230 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 100245 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 100292 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 100294 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 100298 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 100784 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 100785 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 103082 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 103322 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 103757 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 105311 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 105586 of 2023, Writ Petition No. 105650 of 2023
Decided On : 11-06-2025
ORDER :
Suraj Govindaraj, J.
1. The Petitioner in W.P.No.100706/2023 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
a. Issue a writ, or order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 07.07.2022, passed by the R1 SLAO vide Annexure- G bearing No.Tumayo/Bhuswa/28A:vahi:16/ 2010/1027;
b. Issue a writ , order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the R1 SLAO not to award interest under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ;
c. Pass such other order in the interest of justice and equity.
2. The Petitioner in W.P.No.100224/2023 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
a. Issue a writ, or order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 07.07.2022, passed by the R1 SLAO vide Annexure-H bearing No.Tumayo/Bhuswa/28A:vahi:245/ 2013/1023;
b. Issue a writ , order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the R1 SLAO not to award interest under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ;
c. Pass such other order in the interest of justice and equity.
3. The Petitioner in W.P.No.100227/2023 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
a. Issue a writ, or order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 14.07.2022, passed by the R1 SLAO vide Annexure-G bearing No.Tumayo/Bhuswa/28A:vahi:32/ 2011/1029;
b. Issue a writ , order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the R1 SLAO not to award interest under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ;
c. Pass such other order in the interest of justice and equity.
4. The Petitioner in W.P.No.100229/2023 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
a. Issue a writ, or order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 14.07.2022, passed by the R1 SLAO vide Annexure-E bearing No.Tumayo/Bhuswa/28A:vahi:9/ 2008/1029;
b. Issue a writ , order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the R1 SLAO not to award interest under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ;
c. Pass such other order in the interest of justice and equity.
5. The Petitioner in W.P.No.100230/2023 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
a. Issue a writ, or order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 21.07.2022, passed by the R1 SLAO vide Annexure-H bearing No.Tumayo/Bhuswa/28A:vahi:3+6/ 2008- 09/1037;
b. Issue a writ , order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the R1 SLAO not to award interest under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ;
c. Pass such other order in the interest of justice and equity.
6. The Petitioner in W.P.No.100245/2023 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
a. Issue a writ, or order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 07.07.2022, passed by the R1 SLAO vide Annexure- H bearing No.Tumayo/Bhuswa/28A:vahi:267/2013/ 1024;
b. Issue a writ , order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the R1 SLAO not to award interest under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ;
c. Pass such other order in the interest of justice and equity.
7. The Petitioner in W.P.No.100292/2023 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
i. Issue a writ, or order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 14.07.2022, passed by the R1 SLAO vide Annexure-H bearing No.Tumayo/Bhuswa/28A:vahi:51/2011-12/ 1032;
ii. Issue a writ , order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the R1 SLAO not to award interest under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ;
iii. Pass such other order in the interest of justice and equity.
8. The Petitioner in W.P.No.100294/2023 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
a. Issue a writ, or order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 21.07.2022, passed by the R1 SLAO vide Annexure-H bearing No.Tumayo/Bhuswa/28A:vahi:117/2012-13/ 1033;
b. Issue a writ , order or directi
Major General Kapil Mehra and others -v- Union of India and another
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.