Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
Suraj Govindaraj
Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Limited – Appellant
Versus
Special Land Acquisition Officer – Respondent
ORDER :
Suraj Govindaraj, J.
1. The Petitioner in W.P.No.100706/2023 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
a. Issue a writ, or order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 07.07.2022, passed by the R1 SLAO vide Annexure- G bearing No.Tumayo/Bhuswa/28A:vahi:16/ 2010/1027;
b. Issue a writ , order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the R1 SLAO not to award interest under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ;
c. Pass such other order in the interest of justice and equity.
2. The Petitioner in W.P.No.100224/2023 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
a. Issue a writ, or order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 07.07.2022, passed by the R1 SLAO vide Annexure-H bearing No.Tumayo/Bhuswa/28A:vahi:245/ 2013/1023;
b. Issue a writ , order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the R1 SLAO not to award interest under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ;
c. Pass such other order in the interest of justice and equity.
3. The Petitioner in W.P.No.100227/2023 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
a. Issue a writ, or order or direction i
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
