SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 506

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD BENCH 
VENKATESH NAIK T., J.
Vinayak Yellojirao Kadolkar - Appellant
Versus
Shree Om Sai Enterpprises - Respondent
Criminal Petition Nos. 102806, 102807 of 2023
Decided On : 20-06-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Nitin R. Bolabandi
For the Respondent: D.G. Bhat

Directors of a company are vicariously liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act if they are responsible for the conduct of the company’s business, regardless of their claim of non-involvement.

Headnote:(A) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Quashing of proceedings - The petitions seek to quash criminal proceedings for dishonor of cheques issued by a company - The petitioners, being directors, are vicariously liable under Section 141(2) - No evidence presented to justify their innocence or resignation from the company - The complaints adequately state their responsibility for the company's obligations. (Paras 4, 12, 16, 17, 22, 26)

Facts of the case:
The complainant, engaged in supplying industrial scraps, issued cheques amounting to Rs.37,60,438.15 and Rs.10,95,862.75, which were dishonored due to 'Account Closed'. Disputes arose regarding the liability of petitioners as directors.

Findings of Court:
There exists sufficient material to proceed against the petitioners for the offence under Section 138, affirming their involvement as directors in the company's financial dealings.

Issues: The primary question was whether the petitioners, as directors without adequate evidence to prove their innocence, could be quashed from the proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that mere denial of involvement is insufficient; the evidence indicates that the petitioners are in charge of, and responsible for, the conduct of the company's business, warranting proceeding under Section 138 of NI Act.

Result: Criminal petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. abatement of petition against deceased petitioner. (Para 4 , 11)
2. summary of debt due to complainant. (Para 5 , 8 , 10)
3. acknowledgment of debt via cheque issuance. (Para 6 , 9)
4. petitioners' arguments against liability. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. court's analysis of directors' liability. (Para 15 , 16 , 19 , 23 , 26)
6. legal provisions regarding directors' responsibility. (Para 17 , 18 , 21)
7. quashing petitions based on factual disputes. (Para 22 , 25 , 27)
8. final dismissal of petitions. (Para 28)

ORDER :

1. Heard Sri. Nitin R.Bolabandi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri. D.G.Bhat, learned counsel for respondent.

2. The petitioners have filed these petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.632/2020 (arising out of P.C.No.355/2020) and C.C.No.633/2020 (arising out of P.C.No.354/2020), pending on the file of learned JMFC-VIII Court, Belagavi for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as ‘N.I. Act’ for brevity).

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court.

4. In both the petitions, petitioner No.1 is accused No.6 whereas, petitioner No.2 is accused No.7, who died on 02.01.2025. Hence, petitions against petitioner No.2/accused No.7, is abated.

5. The brief facts of the complainant’s case in C.C.No.632/2020 is as under; The complainant is a proprietorship concern dealing in industrial scraps and pig iron. Accused No.1 is a registered company (herein after referred to as “the company”) and accused Nos.2 to 7 are the Directors of the company. Accused Nos.2 to 7 are responsible to and in charge of the company and responsible for the conduct of the business of the company and managing the day today affairs of the company. The company represented by its directors – accused Nos.2 to 7 used to buy industrial scraps and pig iron form the complainant. The complainant used to supply scraps and pig iron to the company as per the purchase orders issued by the company. As on 31.03.2018 as per the books of account maintained by the complainant, an amount of Rs.37,60,438.15 was due to the complainant by accused the company in respect of scraps and pig iron supplied by the complainant to the company. Inspite of several request of the complainant to make the payment due to him, all the accused persons on one or the other pretext, sought time.

6. On 27.10.2020, acknowledging the amount due to the complainant, the authorized signatory of the company who operates under directions and authority of accused Nos.2 to 7, with the knowledge of accused Nos.2 to 7, issued a cheque bearing No.591158 dated 27.10.2020 drawn on State Bank of India, SME Branch, Belagavi, for a sum of Rs.37,60,438.15, towards the amount due to the complainant.

7. On being presentation of the said cheque, same was returned with shara as “Account Closed”. Hence, the complainant got issued a legal notice calling upon the accused persons to pay the amount due under the cheque. Inspite of service of legal notice on the accused they did not make any payment. On the contrary, they had issued untenable reply. Hence, the complainant filed a private complaint in P.C.No.335/2020 before the learned JMFC-VIII, Belagavi, for the offence punishable under Section 138 of NI Act.

8. In Crl.P.No.102807/2023, (arising out of C.C.No.633/2020), the complainant used to supply scraps and pig iron to the company. Accused Nos.2 to 7 are the Directors of the Company. As on 31.03.2018, as per the books of account maintained by the complainant an amount of Rs.10,95,862.75 was due to the complainant by the company in respect of scraps and pig iron supplied by the complainant to the company.

9. On 27.10.2020, acknowledging the amount due to the complainant, the authorized signatory of the company who operates under directions and authority of accused Nos.2 to 7, with the knowledge of accused Nos.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top