IN THE HIGH COURT of KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.G. Pandit, T.M.Nadaf, JJ.
Sri Devaraju, S/O Late Maraiah - Petitioner
Versus
The Commissioner Department of Survey Settlement And Land Records – Respondent
Writ Petition No.21358 of 2021, Writ Petition No.21372 of 2021, Writ Petition No.21605 of 2021, Writ Petition No.21620 of 2021, Writ Petition No.21647 of 2021, Writ Petition No.22455 of 2021, Writ Petition No.22545 of 2021
Decided On : 13-06-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the writ petitions (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. reliefs sought by petitioners (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. facts leading to charges (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. computation of contempt proceedings (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. arguments against initiation of proceedings (Para 20 , 21) |
| 6. court’s findings and conclusion (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
ORDER :
T.M.NADAF, J.
Though these writ petitions are listed for preliminary hearing in ‘B’ group, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, taken up for final disposal.
2. The petitioner in Writ Petition No.21358/2021 is applicant in Application Nos.4946 and 4947/2021, the petitioner in W.P.No.21372/2021 is applicant in Application Nos.4938 and 4939/2021, the petitioner in W.P.No.21605/2021 is the applicant in Application Nos.4942 and 4943/2021, the petitioner in W.P.No.21620/2021 is the applicant in Application Nos.4936 and 4937/2021, the petitioner in W.P.No.21647/2021 is the applicant in Application Nos.4944 and 4945/2021, the petitioner in W.P.No.22455/2021 is applicant in Application Nos.4934 and 4935/2021 and the petitioner in W.P.No.22545/2021 is applicant in Application Nos.4940 and 4941/2021.
3. All the applications stated supra are considered together and dismissed by a common order dated 18.11.2021 by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru, (‘the Tribunal’, for short), challenged in these writ petitions.
4. The petitioner in W.P.No.21358/2021 – Sri.Devaraju, working as Survey Supervisor preferred Application Nos.4946 and 4947/2021 before the Tribunal for the following reliefs:-
“a) CALL for records from the Respondent pertaining to the impugned Articles of Charge dated 05/10/2021 (Annexure - A20) as well as impugned Order dated 07/10/2021 (Annexure - A21);
b) ISSUE WRIT OR ORDER quashing the impugned Articles of Charge dated 05/10/2021 bearing No. SSLR/ADM/15011/100/2021 issued by the Respondent (Annexure-A20) and the impugned Order dated 07/10/2021 bearing No. SSLR / ADM-15011 / 100 /2021 passed by the Respondent (Annexure - A21), in so far as posting the Applicant as Survey Superintendent (Executive), office of the Assistant Director of Land Records, Sringeri is concerned, in the interest of justice and equity;
c) PASS any other Order including the cost of this Application, in the interest of justice and equity.”
5. The petitioner in W.P.No.21372/2021 – Sri.M.S.Abhinandan Kumar, working as Survey Supervisor preferred Application Nos.4938 and 4939/2021 before the Tribunal for the following reliefs:-
“a) CALL for records from the Respondent pertaining to the impugned Articles of Charge dated 05/10/2021 (Annexure- A22) as well as impugned Order dated 07/10/2021 (Annexure- A23);
b) ISSUE WRIT OR ORDER quashing the impugned Articles of Charge dated 05/10/2021 bearing No. SSLR/ ADM/15011/100/2021 issued by the Respondent (Annexure - A22) and the impugned Order dated 07/10/2021 bearing No. SSLR/ADM-15011/100/2021 passed by the Respondent (Annexure A23), in so far as posting the Applicant as Survey Supervisor, Office of the Assistant Director of Land Records, Bellary is concerned, in the interest of justice and equity;
c) PASS any other Order including the cost of this Application, in the interest of justice and equity.”
6. The petitioner in W.P.No.21605/2021 – Sri.Toufiq Ahmed Shariff G.H., working as Surveyor preferred Application Nos.4942 and 4943/2021 before the Tribunal for the following reliefs:-
“a) CALL for records from the Respondent pertaining to the impugned Articles of Charge dated 05/10/2021 (Annexure- A21) as well as impugned Order dated 07/10/2021 (Annexure- A22);
b) ISSUE WRIT OR ORDER quashing the impugned Articles of Charge dated 05/10/2021 bearing No. SSLR/ ADM/15011/100/2021 issued by the Respondent (Annexure - A21) and the impugned Order dated 07/10/2021 bearing No. SSLR/ADM15011/100/2021 passed by the Respondent (Annexure A22), in so far as posting the Applicant as Surveyor, Office of the Assistant Director of Land Records, Yad











Officials are not liable for actions taken in compliance with court orders, and penalizing them based on compliance is an abuse of process.
The exercise of administrative powers under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act must occur within a reasonable time frame to protect property rights.
Disciplinary actions against a government employee must respect principles of natural justice and prior judicial orders, ensuring fairness and unbiased proceedings.
Point of law: Hon'ble the Chief Justice may take note of the observations of this Court and take up suo motu proceedings against the State Government to put an end to the pernicious practice of prov....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.