Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
R Devdas, J
N. Kempaiah Since Deceased by His LRs. Smt. M. Bhagyalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
A.V. Srinivas Since Deceased by His LRs. Smt. M. Kalpana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. These two Civil Revision Petitions and the writ petition arise out of O.S.No.27/2019, on the file of learned I Addl. Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Ramanagara. Therefore, all the three matters were clubbed, heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties shall be referred to in terms of their ranking before the trial court.
3. Prior to the plaintiffs filing O.S.No.27/2019, the 1st defendant Sri N.Kempaiah had filed O.S.No.124/2018 seeking permanent injunction in respect of the suit schedule properties, against the plaintiffs herein. It was the contention of Sri N.Kempaiah that he is the absolute owner of the suit schedule properties. Item No.1 of the suit schedule property bearing Sy.No.160/1, measuring 2 acres 1 gunta situated at Ankanahalli Village, Kilancha Hobli, Ramanagara Taluk and item No.2 bearing Sy.No.160/2 measuring 1 acre 39 guntas were purchased by the plaintiffs brother Sri N.Nanjundaiah under registered Sale Deed dated 03.06.1982. The sale deed was executed by Sri Thimmashetty, the uncle of the defendants. Subsequently, in a family partition that took place between Sri N.Nanjundaiah and his brothers, S
The court affirmed that previous judgments preclude new claims conflicting with established decrees, emphasizing the importance of adherence to procedural rules regarding amendments and the limitatio....
Point of law: Rejection of plaint - Clever or ingenious drafting cannot mask the Court for consideration of am application seeking rejection of the plaint when the suit is barred by limitation on the....
Issues of limitation and sale deed validity require full trial; defenses are not assessed at the preliminary dismissal stage under CPC.
A plaintiff asserting ownership based on historical rights and alleged partition must be permitted to pursue relief through trial when faced with disputed claims and questions of fact.
Amendments to pleadings must not alter the nature of the suit and must be sought with due diligence, particularly before trial commencement; claims based on adverse possession are limited to a 12-yea....
The court reaffirmed that a plaint cannot be dismissed under Order VII Rule 11 based solely on the defendant's contentions; it must be based on the plaintiff's allegations and the merits of the case ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
