Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
E.S. INDIRESH
Mohan Kumar B., S/o Basetty G. – Appellant
Versus
Shobha Karandlaje, D/O Late Monappa Gowda – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks to declare election void. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner seeks to declare election void under specific provisions. (Para 2) |
| 3. court analyzes the procedural requirements under election law. (Para 3 , 16 , 18) |
| 4. petitioner alleges non-compliance with election requirements. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. petitioner provides details of events and allegations. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. respondent argues procedural non-compliance by the petitioner. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. court analyzes sufficiency of pleadings and compliance with electoral laws. (Para 15 , 19 , 20) |
ORDER :
E.S. INDIRESH, J.
ORDERS ON IA No.2 OF 2024 AND IA No. 3 OF 2024
1. In this petition, the petitioner has sought for declaration that, the election of respondent, being the Returned candidate, from the 24-North Bengaluru Parliamentary Constituency as null and void in terms of Section 100(b), 100(d)(i) and 100(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People's Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as Act).
2. On service of summons, respondent entered appearance and filed detailed written statement, denying the averments made in the Election Petition. The respondent has filed application in IA No.2 of 2024 under Section 81(3) of the
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
