2025 Supreme(Kar) 702
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR, J.
Poorna Prabhu D/o Annappa Prabhu - Appellant
Versus
The State of Karnataka - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 13601 of 2024, Criminal Petition No. 9044 of 2023
Decided On : 06-06-2025
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Bhat Ramachandra Ganapati
For the Respondents: Channappa Erappa, Hitesh Gowda
Joint affidavits and voluntary settlements can lead to quashing of criminal proceedings when both parties confirm no further claims against each other, promoting the interest of justice.
Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 498A, 504, 506 - Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Quashing of criminal proceedings - Petitioner and Respondent reached a settlement under Sec. 89 of CPC - Both parties agreed to withdraw allegations and settle pending disputes - Court accepted the joint affidavit, thereby quashing proceedings in C.C.No.29938/2024 and Crime No.0137/2023. (Paras 1-6)
(B) Settlement Agreement - Judicial endorsement of settlement reached between parties is permissible, provided that it is voluntary and without coercion. (Paras 3-10)
Facts of the case:
Petitioner sought to quash proceedings for offences of 498A and related charges after entering into a settlement with the Respondent, confirming no further claims will be pursued.
Findings of Court:
The court quashed the proceedings in both petitions due to mutual settlement.
Issues: The key issue was whether the criminal proceedings could be quashed based on the parties' mutual settlement.
Ratio Decidendi: The court observed that if parties have voluntarily settled their disputes and confirmed no further claims, it upholds the interest of justice to quash proceedings.
Result: Both petitions for quashing were allowed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek quashing of criminal charges. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. affidavit filed and admitted by both parties. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. settlement agreements reached. (Para 5) |
| 4. court quashes proceedings based on agreements. (Para 6) |
ORDER :
1. In Crl.P.No.13601/2024, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:-
“For the reasons stated above the petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the order dated 12.09.2024 of taking cognizance and be pleased to quash the criminal proceedings instituted in CC No.29938/2024 pending on the file of learned VII Addl. CJM, Bengaluru, insofar as it relates to the petitioner-accused No.2 for the offence u/s 506 and 504 of IPC and to pass such other appropriate order or direction which the petitioner is entitled to in the circumstances of the case and in the ends of justice.”
In Crl.P.No.9044/2023, petitioners seek the following reliefs:-
“Wherefore, the Hon’ble is respectfully prayed to quash the FIR and Complaint in East Zone Women P.S., against the Petitioners in Crime No.0137/2023 pending before the Hon’ble Court of VI Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Bengaluru (6th ACMM) for the offence punishable under Sections 4 98A, 34 of the IPC r/w Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 in the interest of justice.”
2. In Crl.P.No.13601/2024, learned counsel for the petitioner-accused No.2 and learned counsel for 2nd respondent – complainant have filed an Affidavit duly signed by the petitioner, 2nd respondent and their respective counsel and the same is taken on record.
3. In Crl.P.No.13601/2024, petitioner-accused No.2 and her counsel and respondent No.2 and his counsel are physically present before the Court and they admit the contents of the Affidavit, which reads as under:-
“AFFIDAVIT
We, 1. Poorna Prabhu D/o AnnappaPrabhu W/o Chetan V Sharma, Aged about 33 years, R/at No.2164, 16th floor, Prestige Lake Ridge, Uttarahalli Main Road, Bengaluru – 560 064, 2. Chetan V Sharma, S/o. Vishwanath, Aged about 29 years, residing at No.2423, 3rd Phase, Yelahanka New Town P.O, Yelahanka New Town, Bengaluru 560 064, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows;
1. The Petitioner No.1 and Respondent No.2 herein are the Wife and the husband respectively, in the above said case and we are well aware of the facts and circumstances of the case and competent to file this petition.
2. We state that, the Petitioner No.1 and the Respondent No.2 upon the mediation agreement drawn under Sec.89 of CPC R/W Rules 24 & 25 of the Karnataka Civil Procedure (Mediation) Rules, 2005 before the II Addl. Prl. Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru in MC No.6566/2023 have agreed to settle all the pending disputes across all forums including the present Criminal Petition. The Ld. Family Court accepted the said agreement and the decree was drawn.
3. We state that, as per Clause No.7 of the settlement agreement, the Respondent No.2 has agreed to co-operate to seek for quashing of the FIR and Complaint in 0235/2024 for the offence punishable under Sections 170, 504, 506, 509 r/w Section 34 of IPC and to quash the proceedings in CC No.29938/2024 on the file of the learned VII Addl. Chief Judicial Metropolitan Magistrate at Bengaluru against the petitioner herein.
4. We submit that, the petitioner has also agreed to co-operate with the Respondent No.2 and seek for quashing of the FIR and Complaint in Crime No.0137/2023 for the offence punishable under Sections 4 98A, 34 of the IPC r/w Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 pending before the Hon'ble Court of VI Addl. Chief Judicial Metropolitan Magistrate At Bengaluru (6th ACMM) in Criminal Petition No.9044/2023 against the Petitioner No.2 and his parents i.e., Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 who are arraigned as accused Nos.1 to 3.
5. We mutually agree that we have no claims left whatsoever either from the past, present or future against each other with respect to the proceedings in Crime No.0137/2023 and CC No.29938/2024 as mentioned a