Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
Masud, S/o Umer – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J.
In Crl.P.No.7576/2005, the petitioners have sought for the following relief:-
“Wherefore, the petitioners who are arrayed as accused No.1 & 2 humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.27656/2024 registered by the Jeevan Bheemanagar Police Station, Bengaluru/1st respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 3 & 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, now the case is pending on the file of the Hon’ble Judicial Magistrate First Class (Traffic Court 1) Bengaluru, in the interest of justice.”
In Crl.P.No.7578/2005, the petitioners have sought for the following relief:-
“Wherefore, the petitioners who are arrayed as accused No.1 & 3 humbly prays that his Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.24706/2022 registered by the East Zone Women Police Station, Bengaluru/1st respondent for the offences punishable under sections 498(A), 323, 504 and 506 of Indian Penal Code and sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, now the case is pending on the file of the Hon’ble XI Additional Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru, in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel fo
A court may quash criminal proceedings when parties present a joint affidavit confirming amicable settlements, as it serves the interest of justice.
Joint affidavits and voluntary settlements can lead to quashing of criminal proceedings when both parties confirm no further claims against each other, promoting the interest of justice.
A petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. can quash proceedings when the parties involved reach a settlement, particularly under compoundable offences as per specific statutory provisions.
Quashing of proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. permissible when dispute settled by legal representatives after the complainant's demise.
The voluntary nature of the settlement, absence of fear, force, or coercion, and the desire of the parties to live peacefully were central to the court's decision to quash the FIR and related proceed....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
